On Tue Jan 23 2001 at 17:20, Matt Fahrner wrote: > At any rate, as I said I don't mind if other options are there as well, > but I think sendmail should remain. Agree 100%. But it should be one option of several mail server packages on offer. (Which may bring up the issue of "distribution bloat"...) Cheers Tony _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Bill Nottingham
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 John Summerfield
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Craig Kelley
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Ingo Luetkebohle
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Ingo Luetkebohle
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Thomas Dodd
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Matt Fahrner
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 Tony Nugent
- Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7 ganesh9