On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Svante Signell wrote:
> When running ping the following message appears:
>
> Warning: no SO_TIMESTAMP support, falling back to SIOCGSTAMP
> Is this warning from glibc? If so, does this mean that iputils have to be
> modified upstream to reflect the changed behaviour in glibc? Other
> causes, solutions?
>
> The new glibc-2.2-5 is installed and iputils-20001007-1 recompiled
> with gcc-2.96-64 and binutils-2.10.1.0.2-1 (both recompiled after the
> installation of glibc)
Kernel shipped with RHL7 lacked SO_TIMESTAMP support for some reason
IIRC.
The support is also missing from old 486's and such but for a real reason.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
