Matt Fahrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Summerfield wrote:
> > I don't know which bash extensions caught me though. Perhaps those who
> > care should identify errors and take it up with the bash developers.
>
> I would argue that ideally if bash is run as "/bin/sh" that nothing
> beyond the POSIX "/bin/sh" specification should function, that is no
> bash extensions should work. This could be accomplished by making bash
> limit itself based on the running name (making this a Bash Group
> problem) or simply using a non-bash limited POSIX only "/bin/sh" (making
> this a RedHat problem). I would think the later would be far more simple
> than the former.
>
> That is of course if anyone cares, because outside Thilo (who brought it
> up in the first place) no one seems to have much interest in the idea.
>
> - Matt
I care, and I agree that /bin/sh shouldn't use bash extensions.
--
Brady Montz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
