>
> This is not necessarily a gcc problem. You have to analyze the nature
> of the problems before saying it is. In 5.0 RH took a lot of flak for
> moving to glibc but when you look at the problems most of them were
> not related to it. It looked more like if the move to glibc had
> stretched RH resources to the point the building and testing of other
> programs was affected.
I didn't intend anyone to think that I think gcc is a cause of any of the
other problems; I see the number of problems reported and (in many cases
fixed) already as an adverse reflection of the quality of RHL 7.0.
gcc is only one of the problems. Dropping support for libc is another.
btw Does anyone know about the new ISOs? What's changed?
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
