Where did you get the idea that running rawhide was a good idea?
Excerpt from README.rawhide:
"Raw Hide Can Be a Bit Tough to Chew on So Run at Your Own Risk (and
Enjoyment)
These releases have not been quality tested by Red Hat's Quality
Assurance
team. They may not boot. If they boot, they may not install. If they
install,
they may not do anything other then waste CPU cycles. If anything
breaks,
you most assuredly own the many fragments which will be littered across
your
floor.
It may not be possible to upgrade from Red Hat to Raw Hide, from Raw
Hide
to Red Hat, or from Raw Hide to Raw Hide! If a stable upgrade path is
important to you, please do not use Raw Hide.
DO NOT USE THESE RELEASES FOR ANY WORK WHERE YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR
APPLICATION
RUNNING, THE ACCURACY OF YOUR DATA, THE INTEGRITY OF YOUR NETWORK, OR
ANY
OTHER PURPOSE FOR WHICH A RESPONSIBLE HUMAN WOULD USE A COMPUTER. (But
then
again what would be the fun of hacking Linux if there wasn't some risk
involved. ;-)....)"
FWIW I'm running rawhide, but: 1) I do regular backups, 2) I have
rawhide on a separate root partition from normal Red Hat.
--
"Jonathan F. Dill" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
