While I prefer man pages due to their concise nature, in dealing with the reality of info pages, I've found TkInfo invaluable. It's definitely worth checking out. http://math-www.uni-paderborn.de/~axel/tkinfo/ Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Stephen Schaefer-NCS Sr SE wrote: > Amen; the cumulative user interface annoyances with info are awful > (and I'm and emacs fan!); but the idea that extensive and in-depth > documentation be organized in a hyper-linked tree with extensive > indexing is good. In fact, it would be just peachy if I could > navigate the info documentation with my web browser. I thought there > was supposed to be a texinfo to html translator, but for some reason > the texinfo documents aren't delivered that way, and it would be a > redundant use of space. An alternative might be a CGI program that > would let the web server translate the .info files into html on the > fly; has anyone written something like that? > > - Stephen P. Schaefer > > On 21 Aug, Dave Ihnat wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 01:01:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> It should be the opposite: let's move off the obsolete man pages: thay > >> were great in the seventies but today we have far more powerful > >> machines who allow far richer ways of provising information. > > > > That's fine; but info is NOT the way to go. It's an awkward, sadly outdated > > interface. > > > > There is STILL a need for manpage-style documentation. Man pages are > > intended to be brief, concise developer or user notes. You shouldn't > > get theory of design, discussion of performance tradeoffs, etc. in a > > man page; there should be a full document behind man page sets that > > provides that kind of information. > > > > I don't want to wade through reams of material I no longer need once I've > > learned a package or system; I want brief usage reminders (without bloating > > my software.) And I want an intuitive interface; info sux at that. > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Dave Ihnat > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list > > _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?)
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:45:57 -0700
- Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Dave Ihnat
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Stephen Schaefer-NCS Sr SE
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Matt Fahrner
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Alan Shutko
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Joe Brenner
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Alan Shutko
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Harry Putnam
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Alan Shutko
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) John Summerfield
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Mike A. Harris