While I prefer man pages due to their concise nature, in dealing with
the reality of info pages, I've found TkInfo invaluable. It's definitely
worth checking out.
http://math-www.uni-paderborn.de/~axel/tkinfo/
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Stephen Schaefer-NCS Sr SE wrote:
> Amen; the cumulative user interface annoyances with info are awful
> (and I'm and emacs fan!); but the idea that extensive and in-depth
> documentation be organized in a hyper-linked tree with extensive
> indexing is good. In fact, it would be just peachy if I could
> navigate the info documentation with my web browser. I thought there
> was supposed to be a texinfo to html translator, but for some reason
> the texinfo documents aren't delivered that way, and it would be a
> redundant use of space. An alternative might be a CGI program that
> would let the web server translate the .info files into html on the
> fly; has anyone written something like that?
>
> - Stephen P. Schaefer
>
> On 21 Aug, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 01:01:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> It should be the opposite: let's move off the obsolete man pages: thay
> >> were great in the seventies but today we have far more powerful
> >> machines who allow far richer ways of provising information.
> >
> > That's fine; but info is NOT the way to go. It's an awkward, sadly outdated
> > interface.
> >
> > There is STILL a need for manpage-style documentation. Man pages are
> > intended to be brief, concise developer or user notes. You shouldn't
> > get theory of design, discussion of performance tradeoffs, etc. in a
> > man page; there should be a full document behind man page sets that
> > provides that kind of information.
> >
> > I don't want to wade through reams of material I no longer need once I've
> > learned a package or system; I want brief usage reminders (without bloating
> > my software.) And I want an intuitive interface; info sux at that.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Dave Ihnat
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-devel-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?)
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:45:57 -0700
- Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Dave Ihnat
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Stephen Schaefer-NCS Sr SE
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Matt Fahrner
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Alan Shutko
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Joe Brenner
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Alan Shutko
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) Harry Putnam
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Alan Shutko
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?) John Summerfield
- Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename(... Mike A. Harris
