I could be wrong, but I understood that there was a string suggestion in hosts-requirements that if you share a network with the host you want to talk to then an interface on that network will be used. rfc-1123 6.1.3.4: When the host name-to-address function encounters a host with multiple addresses, it SHOULD rank or sort the addresses using knowledge of the immediately connected network number(s) and any other applicable performance or history information. Ok, it is only a SHOULD not a MUST but clearly this is the Right Thing. Of course this isn't RH's fault if glibc does the Wrong Thing (TM). -- Jon _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
- resolv.conf "sortlist" option not supported Matt Fahrner
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not sup... Mark A. Bentley
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not... Matt Fahrner
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not... Matt Fahrner
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not su... J . S . Peatfield
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option no... Mark A. Bentley
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not... Matt Fahrner
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not sup... John DiMarco
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not sup... Matt Fahrner
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not sup... John DiMarco
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not... Matt Fahrner
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not... Chris Garrigues
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not sup... Matt Fahrner
- Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not... Chris Garrigues