Chris Garrigues wrote:

> The prevalence of your attitude is part of why the Internet is as unsecure (I 
> don't care what my spell checker says, people are "insecure", networks are 
> "unsecure") as it is today.

Sorry you feel that way; personally, I believe that my attitude is why you
have Linux to work with.  My attitude is old--from the early days of Unix.
It's simply put:  "Do one thing.  Do it well."  If you're a MTA, you deliver
mail.  If you're a MUA, you display and manage mailboxes.

The MTA isn't the security agent.  It shouldn't do security on a
per-user basis.  It may do filtering as a general thing--but denying
E-mail to root is a solution worse than the problem.  And priviliged
users shouldn't be given inappropriate tools--stupid MUAs that violate
security as installed are simply *stupid*.

> If no programmer coded "their idea of security 
> into tools", it would be even worse than it is now.

Perhaps; that wasn't my complaint.  My argument is that people who
don't understand security shouldn't do it for other people without
consulting with those who do.  *That* is certainly why we have the
problems we have today--people *think* they understand security
issues.

> It's already a problem 
> that RedHat ships software that doesn't have all the risky things disabled.  

What I said.

> Default shipped software should be secure. Then if you know what you are 
> doing, you should know how to jump through the necessary hoops to undo that 
> security.

What I said.

> As it stands we're jumping through those hoops backwards and the 
> many of the people who need to jump through them can't.

What I said.

> BTW, I also don't understand your comment about Micro$oft.  One of the 
> complaints about microsoft is that they *don't* design in security!  If they 
> did, fewer people would get "I LOVE YOU" email.

It's what I stated before:  The Micro$ofties don't understand security.  At
all.  But they *think* they should, since they sell software; so they design
bad security.  And frankly, bad security is worse than *knowing* you have
no security...

Cheers,
-- 
        Dave "Louisville Slugger security still works first-hand" Ihnat
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Reply via email to