JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mandrake's marketing claims strongly performance improvements due to > being compiled with PGCC (an unofficial GCC optimized for Pentiuls and Mandrake's developpers claims using gcc2.95 and say it's make a big difference. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.mandrakesoft.com San-Francisco, CA USA. --Chmouel -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Thomas Dodd
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... Alan Shutko
- Re: Why no i586/i686 s... John Summerfield