On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Benno Senoner wrote:
>
> > This would save a LOT of headaches for many people.
>
> While this is still a "redhat" OS it is not a redhat distribution.
> What is RedHats position on this sort of thing.
> Can this be distributed or would there be legal problems?
> I could make an updated iso available. If not I suppose I
> could simply create a RedHat iso with the updates supplied
> by redhat. Then I would need somewhere to use as a ftp
> as the demand would be greater than my humble connection
> could cope with
> creating your iso is also simple and there is a HOW-TO or
> mini HOW-TO somewhere. All you need is a cd-r and
> some HDD space.
Redhat itself should provide this updated ISO image,
and would save them headaches too, since a user which downloads the RH 6.1 ISO
image now (assume that it would be updated with the latest fixes) will not
complain about 2-3 months old security flaws.
It should be Redhat's responsibility to provide the up-to-date distribution in
ISO format, in order to mantain linux's reutation as a "secure operating
system".
So agian my wishes for Redhat are:
-provide an updated ISO every week or so
- or provide a "giant-fix" with the latest update.
Any official response from the Redhat people ?
Is there any reason why this has not been implemented ?
Benno.
>
> I am working now on incorportating the 2.4 kernel which is now
> at 2.3.34 devel but gives me some sort of guide.
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
--
Benno Senoner
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux low-latency audio / scheduling latency benchmarks
http://www.gardena.net/benno/linux/audio
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
