Of course not all clients are monetarily capable or willing to oversize a Lithium based battery but many can. In my mind this is a simpler solution. Its a strategy we're using more to avoid that voltage cliff and reduce the likelihood of even nearing the BMS shutting down with all of its hassle factor.  This higher battery capacity allows a little higher LBCO voltage again to keep the system away from the dreaded BMS cutting out.  With the availability of Midnite's PowerFlo batteries at a much more reasonable price, the added cost for an increase in off-grid reliability may not be out of budget for many systems.

        Gotta love the conversation about parasitic loads also, I hope manufacturers are looking at that.

My $.02

Bill

Feather River Solar Electric
Bill Battagin, owner
4291 Nelson St. (Shipping)
5575 Genesee Rd. (USPS, UPS)
Taylorsville, CA  95983
530-284-7849, 258-1641(cell)
CA. C10 Lic # 874049
Solar Powered since 1982
Home of the Sunny Side Up

On 2/22/2025 1:06 PM, William Bryce via RE-wrenches wrote:
Everyone wants to compare the AIO inverters to the older low frequency inverters when it comes to the idle power draw. But everyone now wants all the bells and whistles.

Nothing is free, and if you take an older system then add up the charge controllers draw, SCP monitoring system, Gateway device, and then add a battery monitor to the mix you will find the Idle draw is much higher than what the MFG says for the inverter alone.

Feel free to check the math with a Schneider XW with 3 VH MPPT controllers, a gateway, a SCP, and lithium batteries running closed loop. Oh, the Schinder does not have any smart loads like most AIO do.

My 2 cents.

Logan



On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 12:03 PM Jason Szumlanski via RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> wrote:

    The voltage cliff is a real issue. Even though LFP batteries can
    be pretty deeply discharged without damage, for practical purposes
    we need to set the LBCO on the inverter at a relatively high
    voltage (or SOC) to avoid the steep part of the cliff altogether,
    rendering a good part of the capacity essentially useless. In
    situations where there is a readily available charging source at
    all times (auto-start generator or grid), there really should be a
    way to overcome this game of chicken between the battery protect
    mode and inverter LBCO. In the off-grid world, I don't consider
    that a bell & whistle, but more of a required feature.

    Maybe it's not so much an inverter issue as much as it is a needed
    battery feature. Imagine if there were a dry contact on a battery
    BMS that told it to stay on regardless of how it was feeling that
    day (subject to safety shutdowns, of course). Then you could force
    the battery to be alive with 48V DC connected when there is
    generator output voltage present, for example. Of course, there
    are risks with this simplistic example, like if the
    inverter/charger is faulted and cannot charge the battery.

    I think the right answer is closed-loop communications that can
    tell a BMS in protect mode to wake up because there is a charging
    source ready to go. If Midnite could implement this with
    AIO/Powerflo, it could be a very powerful selling point. On the
    other hand, maybe it's not that important as long as the inverter
    reliably reaches LBCO well before the battery goes into protect
    mode. That answer could be in closed loop communication logic
    where the BMS sends a warning to the inverter that it is about to
    shut down, so the inverter can stop inverting on the command of
    the battery, but keep the battery connected so a charging source
    will charge it.

    In other words, maybe it would be better for the battery to be in
    command of the inverter's LBCO rather than the inverter's own
    fuzzy logic.

    The parasitic draw issue does need to be addressed. I went through
    some calculations on some typical systems I have in the field. For
    example, one system has a 120kWh battery with four Sol-Ark 15Ks. I
    think the inverter manufacturers prefer "idle consumption" to the
    derogatory parasite comparison, but whatever you call it, let's
    assume 360W for four inverters. If the inverter LBCO is set at 12%
    and the protect mode is triggered at 2%, that gives us 33 hours
    until the battery reaches protect mode in theory. That is a
    substantial amount of time to get a charging source on the
    battery. But in practice, I have seen many batteries enter protect
    mode before a "properly" programmed inverter LBCO engages itself.

    That brings up another feature request. How about dropping the
    idle consumption of paralleled inverters and just keeping the
    primary inverter at full idle?


    Side note: I inherited a site where a Lithionics battery BMS is in
    control of the 2-wire start for a generator. In theory, this
    should work, but in practice, the owner often finds the BMS in
    protect mode with the generator not started. I haven't dug too
    deeply into this issue yet, but direct BMS control of the
    generator is another interesting option. But then you would want
    to build in all of the quiet time, charge percentage/voltage
    limits, exercise, and other logic that typically an inverter
    handles. This is an example of how a BMS is in control of the
    charging source, but it would be better if the BMS was telling the
    inverter what to do in terms of AGS and LBCO.

    Jason Szumlanski
    Principal Solar Designer | Florida Solar Design Group
    NABCEP Certified Solar Professional (PVIP)
    Florida State Certified Solar Contractor CVC56956
    Florida Certified Electrical Contractor EC13013208


    On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 11:17 AM Steve Higgins
    <st...@surrette.com> wrote:

        Hello all...

        The first issue is that inverter/charger parasitic loads have
        increased exponentially in the past 20+ years. When the LBCO
        cuts out, the inverter may shut off, but it does not remove
        itself or any other DC-connected device from the battery. 
         These devices still draw a parasitic load. In the 1990s, the
        Trace SW would pull about .3 to .4 amps of current from the
        battery when connected to it. Today, many manufacturers use
        cheaper transformers, and the high-frequency inverters draw a
        much higher current. Some of these all-in-one inverters draw
        1-2 amps of current from battery banks, just connected and not
        even turned on.

        What's important here is that the battery voltage is already
        very low when you trigger an LBCO shutdown (it's not a
        disconnect). For a 48-volt system, this is 44 to 47 volts,
        depending on where you set the LBCO. When a Lithium battery is
        this low, the voltage dropoff is much higher. With a lead
        battery, the voltage dropoff is much more linear, but with
        Lithium chemistry, this voltage dropoff is more like a cliff. 
          This is why it's important for many of these Lithium systems
        to set the Battery cutouts a bit higher so people have more
        time to fix the situation before the BMS shuts down. 
         Ideally, the customer should be educated not to
        over-discharge the bank, which would help. Many of these
        customers want turnkey systems that they don't want to think
        about but don't want to pay for it or do the work that is
        required to maintain it.

        Now, if the battery had gone into "Protect" mode and the BMS
        had shut down, the battery is outputting very little
        votlage... the inverter/charger needs voltage to run.  There
        used to be a line of inverters in the marine and RV market
        that would do what we called "Dead Battery Restart".   This
        meant there was a parallel circuit in the power supply so that
        when you supplied AC to the input, a secondary power supply
        bypassed the regular battery power supply and would power up
        the inverter and allow the charger to run.   Most of the
        inverter manufacturers got rid of this circuitry because it
        was not cheap, took up space on the boards, and was just
        another circuit that could get damaged with generator/shore
        power surges.   I don't know of an inverter today with this
        dead battery restarting circuit.

        With this, you need to be very careful. If the customer has
        cratered the battery voltage and drawn down the voltage so low
        that they have damaged the cells, jumpstarting the battery can
        create a charging hazard, and that could cause the cells to
        swell internally. If that happens, the battery will get warmer
        and warmer under charge, and eventually, you could have a cell
        rupture.  This can happen quickly with Li-ion, but with LFP,
        it's much harder to create this problem. Usually, in LFP,
        cells will swell a bit, and the current interrupter on the
        individual cell will open up and drop that string, and you
        will lose capacity.

        Like everything else, it's a race to the bottom on cost; this
        affects quality and features... Everyone wants the "Bells &
        Whistles," but they don't want to pay for it.

        Steve Higgins


        On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 5:08 AM Jason Szumlanski via
        RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> wrote:

            I have been thinking a lot recently about the reasons
            off-grid systems can shut down, and working on strategies
            to prevent these nuisances that require manual intervention.

            Ideally, a BMS should never shut down due to low
            voltage/SOC because a properly programmed inverter should
            reach it's cut off well before the BMS decides it needs to
            protect the battery, especially where there is closed loop
            communication. But let's say that happens, where the BMS
            does make the DC battery output go to zero.

            It seems to me like the inverter should be able to start a
            generator, and then signal to the BMS that a charging
            source is available. But I'm not aware of any system that
            actually does this. The inverter should be able to wake up
            the battery. I can see this being particularly possible
            where one manufacturer is writing the code (I'm thinking
            Midnite AIO/Powerflo).

            Of course, the inverter would have to have power in order
            to do that, so if it's nighttime and there is no PV, the
            inverter power would need to come from somewhere. I have
            two thoughts. First, someone could manually start the
            generator, waking up the inverter, but they would not have
            to reset the BMS if the inverter told it to wake up. The
            second way would be for the inverter to somehow close the
            2-wire start circuit upon inverter shutdown, restoring
            power to the inverter automatically.

            If those are not options, an external NO relay powered by
            the inverter output could be added to the 2-wire start
            circuit, perhaps with a time delay to return to the NO
            position to allow the generator to remain powered until
            the inverter does it's thing and starts charging the
            batteries.

            Anyway, my question is whether any inverter/battery
            combination out there works in a way that the inverter
            tells the battery there is a charging source available to
            wake up the BMS and reconnect DC power. And if not, why?

            Jason Szumlanski
            Florida Solar Design Group


    _______________________________________________
    List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

    Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

    List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

    Change listserver email address & settings:
    http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

    There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work,
    try the other:
    https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
    http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

    List rules & etiquette:
    http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

    Check out or update participant bios:
    http://www.members.re-wrenches.org


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here:http://re-wrenches.org

List Address:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to