Great, thoughtful answers from all. I’m going to push this to the 
FineHomeBuilding podcast crew for their ideas, too.

I hate to ask the question I might not want to hear the answer to, but I can’t 
think of anything more horrible than a failed rafter. That would be the resi 
equivalent of the infamous Bakersfield fire.

Thanks, Scot

 

From: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org> On Behalf Of Ray 
Walters via RE-wrenches
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2024 1:42 PM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Cc: Ray Walters <r...@solarray.com>
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] How many times can a rafter have a lag screw put in 
and out before it is no longer structurally sound? Some roofs getting their 3rd 
set of new shingles

 

I would add to this that the size of the lag is a factor too.  3/8" lags into 
1-1/2" wide rafters are going to cause much more damage, and leave larger 
voids, than the new 1/4" high strength lags I use now.  I like the rafter 
sistering idea, as a solution, as well as moving the rails up or down several 
inches to get away from the previous hole.  A third idea is staggering the 
mount pattern from rail to rail, which is something we should all be doing 
anyway to insure the loads are more equally distributed across all the rafters. 
Then we just change the pattern on the 2nd installation.

Unfortunately I think much of this will be lost, since some of the companies 
that roofers subcontract with to do these remove and replace jobs are not 
always the top solar contractors. 

Ray Walters
Remote Solar

On 5/29/2024 10:17 PM, William Miller via RE-wrenches wrote:

Scot:

 

Fascinating question.  It’s a bit ironic that the changing climate is damaging 
the equipment we are utilizing to combat climate change.

 

A lag unscrewed will damage a wooden member less than a lag ripped out.  >From 
your post it seems we are dealing with the former, rather than the latter.

 

If your layout isn’t changing there is a likelihood that the new mounting 
locations will be at our near the old mounting locations.  This will be true 
for a rafter lag or deck mount screw.  It seems to me the process of 
re-screwing in the same spot in a rafter is just as questionable as re-screwing 
in the same spot in sheeting.  I see no benefit in deck mounting and many 
disadvantages.  

 

If severe weather is an issue I would avoid deck mounting unless you have 
vetted the decking and the applicability of the chosen fasteners to that 
material.  I would not standing-seam mount without knowing how the sheeting 
panels are secured and finding a method to calculate how many clips are needed 
given the increasing wind loads.

 

I see two questions about reinstalling screws repeatedly:

1.      Is the rafter less able to support loads?  Or,
2.      Is the rafter (or decking) less able to retain the fasteners holding 
the PV to the roof?

 

Speculation on the above:

1.      Wood fibers adhere to each other.  They are not like a bundle of 
straws.  If you damage a fiber in one place, it is supported on either side of 
the point of damage by this adherence.  My guess is by just withdrawing screws 
a few times you do not compromise the load handling ability of a rafter member. 
 Site built rafters require different considerations than trusses.  Site built 
are a wild-card and need to be considered on a case-by-case basis.
2.      If you penetrate wood with screws multiple times in a small area, you 
are going to make that area “soft.”  Screw holding capabilities will be 
drastically reduced.

 

Options that I see:

 

1.      Flashed stanchions.  The lags never need to be removed.
2.      Blocking, to attach in new locations.
3.      Sistering, again to attach in new locations.
4.      Not deck mounting (IMHO).

 

Anecdote:  We had a tile roof mount inspected one August afternoon.  The 
inspector insisted on looking in the attic.  We asked why and he said this city 
has a particular concern about structural integrity of wood framed roofs.  I 
was aware of this because I have had some silly arguments about this with the 
lead inspector.  Apparently they have seen a lot of big-box solar company 
installers drive lags carelessly and had the lags blow out the side of the 
rafter.  If they spot this they make the installer hire an engineer and design 
a system to sister the rafters to engineering standards.  I totally get this 
concern.  We use a rafter locator and are really careful.  This is not to say 
we have not had a blow out now and then.  You gotta have a feel for the torque 
resistance of a lag while seating.

 

Thank you for bringing this up.  As I said, fascinating (to this wonk).

 

William

 

Miller Solar

17395 Oak Road, Atascadero, CA 93422

805-438-5600

 <http://www.millersolar.com/> www.millersolar.com

CA Lic. 773985

 

 

From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org 
<mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org> ] On Behalf Of Scot Arey via 
RE-wrenches
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 3:16 PM
To: 'RE-wrenches'
Cc: scot.a...@solarcentex.com <mailto:scot.a...@solarcentex.com> 
Subject: [RE-wrenches] How many times can a rafter have a lag screw put in and 
out before it is no longer structurally sound? Some roofs getting their 3rd set 
of new shingles

 

With all our Texas hail storms, we now have roof solar systems that might have 
to come down for the third time as hail-pockmarked shingles need replacement. 
We’re at the 11-year mark of doing business and we have some customers ready 
for another insurance roof claim,

 

So that means a new set of lag screws drilled into rafters…after how many times 
is that 2x6 rafter not 2x6 strength?

I’ve asked this to my 3rd party structural engineer and instead of an answer 
got a “wow, hadn’t thought of that.” We’ve considered going to deck mounts to 
avoid rafters at the 3rd “detach and reset.”

Any of you guys consider this and have your techniques? I suppose in perfect 
world, the mount would stay in place and roofer would shingle around it but we 
still use old-school metal flashing so that is really not possible. I look 
forward to hearing your thoughts on this.

 



 





_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
 
Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org
 
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org 
<mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> 
 
Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
 
There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
 
List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
 
Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
 

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to