That was my understanding too, but the language Jay has from 2017 (and I confirmed in 2020) reads different.  I was positive ground mounted arrays did not need to comply with RSS. The bogus argument made by the businesses influencing the CMP, and by a few mercenaries supposedly representing firefighter concerns was explicitly for roof mounted systems going through its history.  Chris

On 2/1/2022 1:11 PM, Ray wrote:

 Ground mounts do NOT require RSS.  We hashed this out years ago on the Wrenches list, when NEC 2017 came out.

See Figure 690.1(B) Note (2): /" The PV system disconnect in these diagrams separates the PV system from all other systems"./

Thus, the PV disconnect is defined as the transition point from the PV system to all other systems, like battery or inverter systems. The installer/ designer decides where to put that disconnect.  I usually put it on the wall before it goes into the building, and I have never had an inspector question that.

Thanks,

Ray Walters
Remote Solar
303 505-8760
On 2/1/22 10:06 AM, William Miller wrote:

Jay:

Here is the text from 2017:

/690.12 Rapid Shutdown of PV Systems on Buildings. PV/

/system circuits installed on or in buildings shall include a rapid/

/shutdown function to reduce shock hazard for emergency/

/responders in accordance with 690.12(A) through (D)./

//

/Exception: Ground mounted PV system circuits that enter buildings, of/

/which the sole purpose is to house PV system equipment, shall not be/

/required to comply with 690.12./

The wording is interesting.  The requirement is directed at “PV system circuits…”, not PV arrays.  The passage does not specify where the PV feeding those circuits is located, it just addresses where the circuits are, specifically “in or on a building.”

The only circuits that are exempt are those feeding a building that serves only one purpose, to house PV equipment.  For circuits that enter building with other uses—homes, garages, barns, workshops, etc.-- it would seem there is a requirement to have rapid shutdown systems (RSS).

Reading through the rest of the section, I don’t see any language that gets us out of the requirement to reduce voltages to less than 80 volts within 30 seconds inside the array boundary, as in module level shutdown, regardless of roof-top or ground-mount.  Although the 2020 code includes some differing language, I don’t see it as exempting ground mount systems.

The moral of the story is this:  For ground-mounts:  either install RSS or put your equipment (inverters, charge controllers, batteries, BOS) in a separate building housing only that equipment.

I don’t necessarily like the requirement, but I think it exists.  Jay, or anyone, please, please tell me I am reading this incorrectly.

By the way, regarding battery circuits, here is a quote from a post by Bill Brooks on March 16, 2016:

/In the 2017 NEC, we were very careful to carve out all batteries and loads,/

/that were previously part of PV systems, and place them in their own/

/articles./

I have not read through the battery sections of the code to verify this, I am taking Bill at his word.

William Miller

Miller Solar

17395 Oak Road, Atascadero, CA 93422

805-438-5600

www.millersolar.com <http://www.millersolar.com/>

CA Lic. 773985

*From:*Jay [mailto:jay.pe...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:07 AM
*To:* will...@millersolar.com; RE-wrenches
*Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Rapid Shutdown for Off-grid systems

2017 code has a specific exception/clarification for ground mount solar that it does not need RS.

It’s in the first line after 690.12

Jay



On Feb 1, 2022, at 12:13 AM, William Miller <will...@millersolar.com> wrote:

    

    Jerry:

    Yes it is required.  Rapid Shutdown:  NEC 690.12.  All buildings
    except dedicated solar buildings.  Read it and weep.

    William

    Miller Solar

    17395 Oak Road, Atascadero, CA 93422

    805-438-5600

    www.millersolar.com <http://www.millersolar.com/>

    CA Lic. 773985

    *From:*Jerry Shafer [mailto:jerrysgarag...@gmail.com]
    *Sent:* Monday, January 31, 2022 7:21 PM
    *To:* William Miller; RE-wrenches
    *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] Rapid Shutdown for Off-grid systems

    William

    Are you sure RSD is required on a non habitable building,
    historically its not required. Now that being said we use fire
    raptor with the best results, yes it takes an extra conduite and
    might require a button and power supply depending on inverter
    application.

    Jerry

    On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 9:57 AM William Miller
    <will...@millersolar.com> wrote:

        Friends:

        It is quite rare for us to install off-grid systems on
        roof-tops.  We have one coming up with about 20kW on a large
        barn roof.  This will be our first off-grid with a
        module-level rapid shutdown requirement.  I see no exemptions
        from RSS for off-grid systems in the code.  I have looked at
        the options and this is what I have found:

        1.Fire Raptor

        2.Tigo TS4-F

        3.AC coupling with micro-inverters or optimizers

        No one of these approaches seems ideal.  The fire raptor
        requires extra wiring for control leads.  The Tigo requires a
        wireless control system which worries me about reliability. 
        With AC Coupling systems floating the proposed AGM batteries
        may be awkward.  Furthermore, with AC coupled systems one
        cannot charge batteries unless the mini-grid is operational,
        a big problem.

        Have any of you implemented module-level RSS on a
        battery-based inverter system?  I looked in the archives and
        found no threads that apply. Thank in advance.

        William Miller




_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here:http://re-wrenches.org

List Address:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

--
            Christopher Warfel
                     ENTECH Engineering, Inc.
PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 02807
                                401-466-8978
<http://entech-engineering.com>

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to