All right Larry, that's an actual start to a solution.  My comments:
1) We already have had a solution for the array side using a Midnite Birdhouse and Midnite rapid disconnecting combiner box. (The /PV Circuit/ of the "/PV system circuit/" so I wasn't questioning that)
2) Who is the supplier of the 400 amp solenoid,
3) is it UL listed for Rapid disconnect,
4) does it have an approved enclosure? (ie. does the solenoid comes mounted in a UL listed assembly)

Thanks,

R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760

On 3/15/2016 2:57 PM, Starlight Solar Power Systems wrote:
I thought this idea (attached) was a simple solution for array and battery rapid shutdown using a Classic controller and solenoids. The PV solenoids are 350 amp continuous @ 700 Vdc, and 400A @ 48 volts for the battery. Cost is about $120 each.

Midnite told me than plan to implement the arc fault relay control. A simple SPST switch in series with the 12 volt Aux output will allow shutdown. Add a fire alarm output relay for auto-shutdown in case of fire. Seems like a simple, cost effective way to me.

Any comments Ray, Pete, Bill?





Larry Crutcher
Starlight Solar Power Systems




On Mar 15, 2016, at 12:48 PM, Patrick Shortell <pshorte...@gmail.com <mailto:pshorte...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear List,
Maybe it's an over simplistic opinion, but shouldnt all sources be disconnected rapidly in an emergency situation. We can always do better than what the code requires. I get frustrated when people go to the book, (and try to hide behind the text). instead of thinking through real life scenarios.
There are simple ways to work around these issues.
I find when something is questionable, Ill call the AHJ and get his approval First.
What would I do in my own house?
What if someone thought all the power was off when they dragged a hoseline into my basement.
My two cents
Pat

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:10 PM, <billbroo...@sbcglobal.net <mailto:billbroo...@sbcglobal.net>> wrote:

    Ray,

    I guess I have to step in after that acknowledgement. PV system
    circuit is a
    self-defined term and therefore cannot be defined unless you are
    going to
    develop a meaning that is different from the self-definition. It
    means ANY
    circuit in a PV system. This includes battery and stand-alone
    circuits in
    the 2014 NEC.

    The language of the 2014 NEC was a compromise between the fire
    service and
    the PV industry.  Originally, the language required essentially
    module-level
    shutdown. I raised the concern with the PV industry to get them
    involved
    since most were not paying attention at the time. This language was
    developed and intended to cover all circuits in a PV system. In
    the 2014
    NEC, batteries are part of a PV system and therefore fall under this
    requirement.

    In the 2017 NEC, we were very careful to carve out all batteries
    and loads,
    that were previously part of PV systems, and place them in their own
    articles. Don't shoot the messenger on this one and don't think
    for a minute
    that I alone made this requirement or am alone in interpreting it
    in this
    way. I did author this compromise with other representatives of the PV
    industry so I think I know what the intent was.

    It is understandably difficult for battery systems and I would try
    to keep
    battery circuits as short as possible. The 5-feet was intended to
    match the
    requirement of 690.71(H)--which is further evidence of the intent
    of the
    2014 NEC.

    The 2017 NEC removes batteries from the requirement, but they
    still cannot
    backfeed the PV array. Energy storage systems (Article 706) will
    have their
    own requirements in time--that is guaranteed.

    Bill.


    -----Original Message-----
    From: RE-wrenches
    [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
    <mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org>] On
    Behalf Of Ray Walters
    Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:02 AM
    To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
    <mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>>
    Subject: [RE-wrenches] Rapid Shutdown

    Greetings Esteemed Wrenches:

    I've just heard back from our inspector here in Colorado, and we
    are still
    being required to disconnect the batteries under 690.12.  No where
    in 690.12
    are batteries mentioned, nor in the appropriate 690.71 section
    that deals
    with batteries.  The entire reasoning behind this is based on a single
    article written by a single person: Bill Brooks.  I have contacted
    both
    Outback and Magnum on this issue, and their engineers are unaware
    that rapid
    shutdown applies.
    My interpretation is that I could install an inverter and battery
    system
    that was charged from a generator, and we would not need any rapid
    shutdown
    at all.  But according to Bill, as soon as I put a single solar
    module into
    the system, suddenly the entire system becomes PV? The problem
    lies with the
    term 'PV System circuit'  used in 690.12. 690.2 Defines 'PV Output
    circuit', and 'PV source circuit', but there is no 'PV system circuit'
    defined.  690.12 therefore uses an undefined term.
    Our design uses 2 inverters, so if we used Midnite's E panel with
    their
    remote trip breakers, the 2nd inverter would be more than 5 ft
    from the
    batteries.  If we used Magnum or Outback DC disconnects (that
    would comply
    with the 5 ft rule specified in 690.71) they don't offer remote trip.
    We have a Midnite Rapid disconnect Combiner on the roof with the
    Birdhouse,
    so we are complying with 690.12, it should not be applied to batteries
    though.

    Thanks,

    --
    R.Ray Walters
    CTO, Solarray, Inc
    Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
    Licensed Master Electrician
    Solar Design Engineer
    303 505-8760




_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to