Ray, looking at my tower climbing class reference materials I also can find
no reference that to be OSHA approved, equipment *must* be ANSI, all I see
is "suggested." But the tensile strength and full-body harness requirements
are in OSHA. William, harnesses with both front and rear D-rings are
available.

Dan Fink
Buckville Energy
IREC Certified Instructor™ for:
~ PV Installation Professional
~ Small Wind Installer
NABCEP / IREC / ISPQ Accredited Continuing Education Providers™
970.672.4342



On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Ray Walters <r...@solarray.com> wrote:

>  I prefer climbing gear as its much lighter weight and doesn't drag you
> around.  I actually think in some cases that traditional fall protection
> gear can be more of a tripping hazard than the safety it provides.
> However, I was previously under the impression that if OSHA (or in the
> islands: HIOSH) came around, we had to ditch the climbing gear and get into
> the 3 times as heavy regular harnesses.
> I just looked at the OSHA website though, and it doesn't seem to specify
> certification, just that the equipment meet the fall criteria as Dan
> mentioned.
> https://www.osha.gov/Region7/fallprotection/fall_protection_info.html
> This doesn't mention test procedures or certification of equipment.
> Here's more from the actual OSHA 1926 book:
>
> *1926.502(e)(3)*
>
> Connectors shall be drop forged, pressed or formed steel, or made of
> equivalent materials.
>
>  *1926.502(e)(4)*
>
> Connectors shall have a corrosion-resistant finish, and all surfaces and
> edges shall be smooth to prevent damage to interfacing parts of this system.
>
>  *1926.502(e)(5)*
>
> Connecting assemblies shall have a minimum tensile strength of 5,000
> pounds (22.2 kN)
>
>  *1926.502(e)(6)*
>
> Dee-rings and snaphooks shall be proof-tested to a minimum tensile load of
> 3,600 pounds (16 kN) without cracking, breaking, or taking permanent
> deformation.
>
>  "Equivalent materials" ?  Seems that an aluminum caribiner that meets
> the other criteria would be equivalent.
>
> Here, Petzl also makes a full line of worker safety equipment:
> http://www.petzl.com/en/Professional/Verticality?l=US#.VLqw4nuLXfc
>
> This is really interesting, and I would like to have a more definitive
> answer from OSHA.  It would be great if we could use lighter weight
> climbing gear; just compare a caribiner to the heavy steel monsters you get
> at Grainger's.  As long as it is strong enough:
> Lighter weight = less fatigue= safer,  IMHO.
> As with so many discussions on this list, it will ultimately depend on
> your local authorities.
>
> R.Ray Walters
> CTO, Solarray, Inc
> Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
> Licensed Master Electrician
> Solar Design Engineer303 505-8760
>
> On 1/16/2015 11:20 PM, Benn Kilburn wrote:
>
> James,
> This looks like a pretty nice lanyard w/ shock-absorber, rope-grab and rope.
>
> What type/style harness did he bring along?
>
> Re: OSHA approved...great question. Prior to looking into it further I'd 
> suspect it falls in a "grey area".
>
> Benn Kilburn
> SkyFire Energy Inc. 780-906-7807
>
>  On Jan 16, 2015, at 9:29 AM, James Rudolph <jamesrudolp...@gmail.com> 
> <jamesrudolp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Aloha my Wrench Brothers!
> We have a recent defector from a very large National Solar company here that 
> brought in this great Fall gear (see attachment). To be honest it blew my 
> mind how simple and light it was....Is anybody else using this rock climbing 
> equipment as fall protection gear? Is this approved by OSHA.
>
> You would figure if humans just free climbed El Capitain with gear like this 
> it would do just fine keeping me safe and compliant at 6 feet and above.
>
> The rope grab is made by KONG.
>
>
> Mahalo in advance!
>
> James Rudolph
> Haleakala Solar
>
> <20150114_074111.jpeg>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & 
> settings:http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>  _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & 
> settings:http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to