Dick;
I'm not advocating for a color coding system I invented. It is not
dependent on how a wrench's head is wired; its corresponds to how his
meter is wired. This is simply combining NEC compliance with almost
universal common practice (batteries, automotive, forklifts,
multimeters, battery based inverters)
R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760
On 6/30/2013 9:58 AM, Richard L Ratico wrote:
Ray,
Conductors can be mislabled regardless of the system used. The accident you
described had nothing to do with conductor color or labeling. It was caused by a
gross violation of sound electrical procedure and plain common sense. Your
electricians failed to check for correct polarity before making their
terminations.
I grant your system works for you and could for others. But until the NEC forces
us all onto the same page, an argument can be made that any coding system is as
confusing as another. Pardon the pun, it depends on the way a wrenches's head is
wired.
Dick Ratico
Solarwind Electric
--- You wrote:
We have standardized on DC markings White negative and Red positive.
Chris Mason
Comet Systems
Anguilla (264) 235-5670
St. Kitts (869) 662-5670
skype netconcepts
NABCEP Certified Solar PV InstallerTM
Renewable Energy Systems professional
Generac Generators Factory technician
On Jun 29, 2013 8:30 PM, "David Katz" <dk...@aeesolar.com> wrote:
Watch out for accountants who become installers. They always thing red
negative and black positive.
David Katz
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 28, 2013, at 5:40 PM, "Ray Walters" <r...@solarray.com> wrote:
Richard, when you use your Fluke 87 to measure Vdc, black is negative,
red is positive. The black is labeled common because the meter can also
be used for current measurements. (I have a Fluke 89)
When you start using black wire for positive, it may be allowed by code,
but there just isn't a good reason for it.
Its just too easy to make a mistake, and its just too easy to adhere to
the multimeter convention and keep it safer.
I have personally watched seasoned electricians argue color coding with
me, then minutes later get mixed up and wire two 10 module strings in
series, because they forgot for a moment that they were working on a
positive grounded system. The result was an almost 1000 v arc that
jumped an opened fuse holder (only rated to 600 vdc) and started a small
fire in the inverter, before I disconnected it at the array.
Please give one example where leaving positive unmarked with black wire
makes more sense than taping it. Colored electrical tape, and label
tape are much cheaper than inverters and people. THHN, USE, and PV wire
can all be purchased in red, white, and black. (which saves time with
multiple home runs)
Its not code yet, but it's good sense, all the way back to the color
coded jumper cables you might have in your trunk.
I have discussed this with many electricians over the years, but
eventually every single one sees that's its really easy, no cost, and
still code compliant to make things safer.
R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760
On 6/28/2013 2:49 PM, Richard L Ratico wrote:
Respectfully:
My Fluke 87 does not use this convention. Black is labeled the COMMON
terminal,
the red terminal is labeled according to function, not polarity.
Battery based
inverter manus. using this convention typically provide BOS enclosures
with OCP
for only one inverter conductor. This requires the other conductor to be
grounded and colored white or gray. Therefore IMHO the manus. should
use only +
or - to identify inverter terminals. Many, if not most, battery
companies do
this already. Mr. Wiles is, of course, welcome to his opinion.
I would suggest we stay with the NEC required use of any color other
than white,
green or gray for ungrounded conductors. This gives installers some
flexibility.
It also encourages the guy on the hot roof or the gal in the stuffy
mechanical
room to check and double check, maybe triple check polarity, as they
should be
doing anyway. I do like the practice of enhanced identification of
conductors in
positive ground systems.
Dick Ratico
Solarwind Electric
--- You wrote:
The convention of red for positive and black for negative is not just
automotive. It is also used by all battery based inverter manus, all
battery companies, and all multimeters.
John Wiles also agrees;
red = positive, black = negative for ungrounded systems
red = positive, white = negative for negative grounded systems
white = positive, black = negative for pos grounded systems.
I take it a step further, and use white label tape with red lettering
that says "+ positive ground + ",
because I've seen so many problems with positive grounded systems, and
people not getting polarity correct.
All of this is NEC compliant, and follows standard conventions.
Make it easy on yourself and your journeymen on a hot roof, and have
your color coding match their multimeter.
You might save an inverter or even a life.
R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760
On 6/28/2013 12:09 PM, Allan Sindelar wrote:
On 6/28/2013 11:47 AM, a...@aramsolar.com wrote:
And of course Red for positive and black for negative.
Most building departments have not pick up on this yet. But they will.
Aram
Where does "of course Red for positive and black for negative" come
from, please? I only know it as an automotive standard that has often
caused confusion when used by DIY offgridders in years past, as black
thus could represent either positive or negative in a DC conductor
pair.
Is there yet a convention for ungrounded arrays? While red and black
are technically correct as ungrounded current-carrying conductors, use
of this color convention could cause as much confusion as resolve it
in the future. How about "black and black" or for that matter "yellow
and orange" (if supplied by manufacturers) for ungrounded arrays?
Thanks, Allan
*Allan Sindelar*
_Allan@positiveenergysolar.com_ <mailto:al...@positiveenergysolar.com>
NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional
NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional
New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician
Founder and Chief Technology Officer
*Positive Energy, Inc.*, a Certified B Corporation^TM
3209 Richards Lane
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507
*505 424-1112 office 780-2738 cell*
_www.positiveenergysolar.com_ <http://www.positiveenergysolar.com/>
--- end of quote ---
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
--- end of quote ---
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org
