Kent,

Life should be so easy as to be able just to tweak the firmware and
make things all better.

The moment a change is made to the firmware where the zero-crossing
detection is involved .. UL safety standards mandate the inverters must
undergo re-certification to the applicable aspects of UL1741.  In this case,
it would mean retesting to IEEE 1547 (anti-islanding) to prove the change
in the firmware hasn't affected any aspect of the inverter disconnect under
abnormal line conditions -- and possibly other retesting as well.

Such a firmware change may also render all modified units incompatible
with the manufacturer's communication schemes presently in place.

Not to defend a competitor .. but likely every grid-tie inverter maker would
be in the same situation here if the TWACS system causes inverters to see
what's perceived as an abnormal line condition, and they cease producing
power as a result.

Likely an engineering solution can be found, but it would extend beyond
what even most advanced installers would be able to derive (though there
may be a rare few out there who could solve this on their own...).

This now becomes a situation where our industry needs to sit down
with the monitoring industry to create a workable answer.


Dan



--- On Sun, 7/8/12, Kent Osterberg <k...@coveoregon.com> wrote:

From: Kent Osterberg <k...@coveoregon.com>
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Smart grid grid-connected compatibility
To: "RE-wrenches" <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
Date: Sunday, July 8, 2012, 7:40 PM


  

    
  
  
    Chris,

      

      SCRs are capable of creating voltage spikes that cause noise well
      into the radio frequencies. But with TWACS there is an inductor in
      series with the SCR that is tuned such that the pulse caused when
      it fires is 0.5 ms to 1.0 ms wide with very little high frequency
      content. Because the frequency content is very low, it difficult
      to filter out. Ferrite toroids are of no help and large capacitors
      will prevent the utility from reading the meter too. The pulse
      location is near the zero crossing so it makes for a dirty looking
      waveform for about 8 seconds while the meter is sending data.
      Never-the-less, it's actually easy to make a reliable frequency
      measurement by shifting the measurement threshold off zero far
      enough that the TWACS signal doesn't interfere. The Enpase folks
      should be able to do that with a firmware change.

      Kent Osterberg
Blue Mountain Solar, Inc.
www.bluemountainsolar.com
t: 541-568-4882
      On 7/8/2012 4:47 PM, Chris Mason wrote:

    
    Kent,
      I haven't any direct experience with the smart meters
        tripping inverters, but the issue of SCRs and generators is well
        known. I suspect you understand the problem, but to recap it,
        the problem revolves around the way SCRs make a sine wave.
      A motor driven generator controls the alternator output by
        increasing or decreasing the DC excitation level. It does that
        by sensing the "zero crossing", or point in the sine wave at
        which the voltage is zero. This happens 120 times a second on a
        60Hz system.
      When the source of the electricity is electronic, the
        waveform will sometimes be messy around the zero crossing. That
        gives the voltage control circuit problems to detect the zero
        crossing We see this a lot when trying to drive a UPS from a
        generator, it can drive the generator crazy.
      

      
      I suspect your problem is the same. The SCR in the meter
        disturbs the waveform and the inverter thinks it is a faulty
        waveform.
       I would try a low pass filter between the meter and the
        inverter. A properly sized capacitor ought to remove any noise
        above 60hz and present a clean waveform to the inverter.
      

      
      

        On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Kent
          Osterberg <k...@coveoregon.com>
          wrote:

          
            Wrenches,

            

            There weren't very many replies to my question about
            grid-connected inverter compatibility with utility remote
            meter reading systems so I'll explain my recent experience
            with hope that this information may be of assistance
            sometime.

            

            Last fall I installed an Ephase system for a customer. Soon
            after it was on line he complained that the inverters were
            dropping off line frequently. Since we had a lot of cloudy
            weather in northeast Oregon all winter, it wasn't easy to
            see what was going on. In the spring we had some clear days
            and noticed that the inverters were dropping off line
            several times a day at exactly the same time every day. It
            didn't take very long for our suspicion to turn to the
            utilities new remote meter reading equipment. Because our
            weather has been so cloudy it took a while to find clear
            days where the utility could provide assistance. But with
            their help by reading the meter on demand and temporarily
            disabling the meter communications we were able to finally
            prove the remote meter reading system is tripping the
            inverters offline for five minutes every time the meter
            sends a data packet.

            

            Recently the remote meter reading system has expanded to
            more areas so we have now observed this problem with both
            Enphase M190 and M215 inverters. The system we've observed
            that is in town is seeing many more dropouts, so we think
            every kWh meter on the same service transformer and maybe
            some beyond it are causing trouble too.

            

            The remote meter reading equipment is made by Aclara and
            uses their TWACS technology. This isn't new technology and
            with more remote meter reading systems going in all the time
            there will be more occurrences of incompatibility. Certainly
            more between Enphase and TWACS. And possibly more between
            other inverters and other communications systems.

            

            At present I'm really dissatisfied with Enphase's support on
            this issue. All they've done is point out that only a few
            systems have been affected and put us in the position of
            telling customers that they'll just have to live with the
            lost production time. Until Enphase comes up with a fix, I
            won't install any more Enphase inverters.

            

            -- 

            Kent Osterberg

            Blue Mountain Solar, Inc.

            www.bluemountainsolar.com

            t: 541-568-4882

            
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to