Ron, 
 
>From what Daryl said below and the fact that your customer has about 15 amps 
>of PV charge, you should deduct that the batteries have MOSTLY been deficit 
>charged their entire life.  Here's what I told you on Oct 22 in my lengthy 
>explanation about what the problem is and why it happened: "Undersized RE 
>charging systems, or perhaps oversized batteries, is the culprit that 
>contributes to this all too frequent phenomenon of chronic undercharging." 

You said that the customer has been compensating for an undersized system by 
running a generator. They can not know this because there is no monitor. The 
batteries now have a sulfation problem, perhaps unrecoverable, that could have 
been prevented if the owner had a battery capacity monitor. This is not 
pleasant news, I know. I have to explain this bad news to people MANY times 
each week. This is a huge issue globally. And such waste of money, time and 
resources just bugs me!

Larry Crutcher
Barer of Bad News
Starlight Solar Power Systems

On Nov 17, 2011, at 5:17 AM, penobscotso...@midmaine.com wrote:

> Ron,
>   I'm going to reiterate what Jeff says here. It is similar to what I had
> said in my email. The charge rate must REGULARLY be C10 on the KS 
> (5000 series) batteries. This means, on KS 25's, a routine bulk
> charging rate of 135 amps. I find that on these types of hybrid
> systems, while the batteries might occasionally (sunny day, generator
> running, etc.) that kind of charging, they do not regularly see C10. I
> think if you gave Jamie Surrette a call he would give you the same
> possible assessment.
>   I do think the problem is oversulfation, but none of this solves your
> problem, I know. We have been installing KS series batteries since they
> came out and this necessity of regular C10 charging has been an
> integral  part of design for me for many years.
> 
> Best,
> Daryl
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Ron,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This reply a little late since I have been off line a few days.  I
>> mentioned
>> in a similar thread last year that I had an off grid home client I
>> designed
>> and installed in Idaho back in 1998 that had a Kohler 8.5 kw generator, a
>> Trace 4024 inverter, two separate solar arrays and Outback charge
>> controllers, and 16 Trojan "L-16" batteries.  This system worked
>> flawlessly
>> for 7 years and only required the generator a few hours per month, then it
>> was time to change the batteries.  I replaced the Trojans with the same
>> size
>> battery made by Surrette and everything went to crap.  They had to run the
>> generator hours and hours to get them past an 80% charge and we had lots
>> of
>> problems with overloading the generator even though we did not make any
>> program changes and used the same generator.  The generator was replaced 2
>> years later but this system  never worked like it did before the battery
>> replacement.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> When researching all this at that time I had talked with Surrette, Trojan,
>> and anyone else that might help and this is what I found out.  Of course
>> there are just my opinions based on these conversations, but it is my
>> understanding that Surrette is a much longer life battery with much less
>> water loss when comparing apples and apples, and I was told this was due
>> to
>> a different lead composition that Surrette uses than any other battery
>> manufacturer.  However, this difference requires a much longer
>> absorption/taper off charge process or you will never get it past 80%
>> charged.  This of course is almost impossible to achieve with a generator
>> or
>> undersized solar array, and you really need a grid connection to fully
>> charge these things.  No doubt these would be great in some standby grid
>> connected system but I no longer use them in off grid.  This was also at a
>> time when battery manufacturers were just discovering solar so maybe
>> battery
>> designs have changed.  Again, I think Surrette is a good company and makes
>> a
>> great battery, but just not sure you can fully recharge them with a
>> mid-sized generator.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I also do not like using parallel battery layouts as its hard to keep one
>> string from pulling down the other strings when there is a low performance
>> cell so you might do a cell by cell check.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Good Luck,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jeff Yago
>> 
>> DTI Solar Inc.

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to