Hi Allan,

that said it is a ETL listed device no?

And in regards to Xantrex, the old DC disconnect had breakers on the side as 
well as the conduit box for the SW, again UL or ETL listed.
Can you elaborate?

jay

peltz power
On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Allan Sindelar wrote:

> Ray,
> I don't think Robin has posted anything, it just came in a conversation we 
> had. As I understand it, service equipment must have nothing interfering with 
> designated working clearance, within a few inches of depth allowed. With 
> Outback, Magnum, and Xanschneider the breakers are on the front surface and 
> are within the allowable depth. Midnite/Magnum and Midnite/Outback places 
> them back toward the back wall with the inverter on the hinged cover; thus 
> the battery enclosure technically sticks out too far. The XW Midnite panel 
> doesn't have this issue, as it's a different layout. If necessary, one 
> solution would be to mount the E-Panel several inches out from the wall 
> surface.
> Allan
> 
> Allan Sindelar
> al...@positiveenergysolar.com
> NABCEP Certified Photovoltaic Installer
> EE98J Journeyman Electrician
> Positive Energy, Inc.
> 3201 Calle Marie
> Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507
> 505 424-1112
> www.positiveenergysolar.com
> 

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to