<mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>

Hi Matt:

Thanks for your opinions. Just a couple comments.

1. Azimuths. We fixed this issue some time ago.

2. Too many steps.
Except for large rooftop installations, most sites can really be analyzed with a good eye and a compass. The purpose of a shading tool is documentation. There are always trade offs in engineering design. The positive benefit of the ASSET is that the resulting panoramic image is an undistorted view from the location. All other tools have a fish-eye perspective, which, in my opinion, makes it difficult to communicate details of the shading to a customer or inspector. When you consider the total time assessing a site, documenting locations of utility interconnect, wiring runs, etc. the survey many times itself is just a small part of your time.

There will always be some personal preferences in choosing a tool. It's nice to have three choices where once there was only one.

Best Regards,
Brian Wiley
Wiley Electronics LLC


On 9/9/2010 7:00 PM, Skip Towne wrote:
I checked out this instrument when it came out a couple years ago. In my opinion, there were two fatal flaws with it.

   1. It only evaluates azimuths +/- 45 degrees of true south...
   2. It required too many steps. I.e. Shoot at least 7 images;
      Download to your computer; Stitch the images together into a
      single file; Run the analysis; Generate the report...

I discussed these issues with the Wiley folks and they pretty much didn't think any of this was a problem... Don't know if they have addressed these issues or not. From reading the manual again, it looks like they have not.

Compared to the Solmetric SunEye, it's too limited, too complicated, and has too many chances for errors. The SunEye is a professional tool. The ASSET is not.

$0.02001

-Matt Lafferty

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:46 PM, benn kilburn <b...@daystarsolar.ca <mailto:b...@daystarsolar.ca>> wrote:

    Wrenches,

    I'm looking at trying out another 'solar site evaluation tool',
    the ASSET (Acme Solar Site Evaluation Tool) from Wiley
    Electronics.  I'm looking for feedback on its performance and
    user-ability.
    I have been using the pathfinder which is great, but not the
    pathfinder software.

    Any comments on the ASSET or Pathfinder software would be greatly
    appreciated.

    Cheers,
    benn

    DayStar Renewable Energy Inc.
    b...@daystarsolar.ca <mailto:b...@daystarsolar.ca>
    780-906-7807
    HAVE A SUNNY DAY


    _______________________________________________
    List sponsored by Home Power magazine

    List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
    <mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>

    Options & settings:
    http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

    List-Archive:
    http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

    List rules & etiquette:
    www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
    <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>

    Check out participant bios:
    www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org>




_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options&  settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules&  etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3126 - Release Date: 09/10/10 
03:08:00

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to