Pat,

At what point (kW or cost) does a weather station with online monitoring make 
sense? 
I like to put a weather station on all commercial PV systems and upscale 
residential systems unless the client does not want it or will not pay for it. 
I like to measure irradiance, wind speed and direction, ambient and cell 
temperature (and rainfall if the customer will pay for it). Then I have the 
system call me automatically when performance is not as expected. I also like 
to put CTs on the grid to make sure utility input is correct.

What (or who ) defines "normal weather?"
You don't have to be concerned with weather if your DAS measures actual 
performance against calculated expected performance. We have early morning fog 
in southern California, so I set the automatic trouble call for between 10am 
and 4pm.

Defining expectations for the large (> 1M) installations must be particularly 
vexing - what constitutes normal or expected downtime due to mechanical failure 
becomes key to structuring PPA's.
I write into the service contract that we will respond to customer or automatic 
trouble calls 48 or 72 hours during weekdays (not weekends) and during regular 
business hours (8to5). I have had only one client who wanted me to wear a 
pager. I told him that (1) PV systems are reliable, (2) if his system was not 
powering emergency or life support loads, and (3) he would have to pay my 
hourly rate 24/7 if he wanted me on call 24/7. He quickly changed his mind 
about how important his PV system was.

Joel Davidson

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: solar...@aol.com 
  To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org 
  Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:57 AM
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Volcanos,reduced solar production and kWh 
performance warr...


  Marco:

  At what point (kW or cost) does a weather station with online monitoring make 
sense?  
  What (or who ) defines "normal weather?"
  Defining expectations for the large (> 1M) installations must be particularly 
vexing - what constitutes normal or expected downtime due to mechanical failure 
becomes key to structuring PPA's.
  If making a warranty on kWh production must be part of a contract, a number 
of concerns must be tackled in the way it is written, especially with regard to 
the value of compensation.  Maybe funds could be awarded for over production or 
applied as a credit against lower than expected kWh. 

  Pat Redgate
  Ameco

  In a message dated 4/26/2010 4:38:43 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
solar1onl...@charter.net writes:

    Hi Marco,

    I hope this query does not divert response to your original question.

    How is the situation of the reduced performance due to the volcano (or 
other "acts of God" or the like) approached in the Power Purchase contract? 
Perhaps this could be titled "Reduced Solar Production As a Result of Reduced 
Solar Input". 

    TIA,

    Bill Loesch
    Solar 1 - Saint Louis Solar

    PS As I remember, the last time I bought a new vehicle, back in the Dark 
Ages, the auto manufacturer's warranty deferred to the tire maker's warranty 
(for tires), etc. Any similarity?


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Marco Mangelsdorf 
      To: 'RE-wrenches' 
      Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:02 PM
      Subject: [RE-wrenches] Volcanos,reduced solar production and kWh 
performance warranties


      This thread brings up a very timely issue that I’m dealing with right now 
with PV Power Purchase Providers.  As an integrator providing turnkey PV 
systems of X kW, I’m being asked to contractually agree to a minimum 
performance warranty for said PV systems.  I am EXTREMELY uncomfortable to any 
such clause in any contract that I would sign.  I have strong confidence in my 
PV design capabilities  and engineering support and in my professional crew to 
install a top-quality PV system.  I have a lot less confidence in an inverter 
manufacturer being able to get to a site on a Hawaiian island in the middle of 
the Pacific in a super timely fashion as the lost PV kWhs rack up.  And as I 
mentioned in a previous post today, we have an active volcano here that’s been 
spewing since 1983, a volcano that could get a lot worse on any given day.  I’m 
leaning strongly against agreeing to any such clause.  Way too bad a precedent 
to set.  Way too much of a liability.

       

      Anyone else had to deal with this bugger of a performance warranty demand?

       

      Thanks,

      marco

      ProVision Solar

       

      Marco:

       

      Our production schedule has been in tatters - lowered by perhaps 30% 
because of the rain.... can't plan, can't do.  Then I pay overtime on good days 
to (try to) catch up.

      We have a number of systems online and I had not thought to actually 
review and compare from this year to last.  I'll let ya know.

       

      We'll get a call like - "My bill is higher than last year (edison has a 
bar graph of monthly consumption for the past 13 months) and I'd like you to 
look at my system" or My meter is not going backwards, should I call edison?"  
The weather is so consistently wet this winter (think Hilo) that we usually 
just need to ask-

      "Been outside lately?"

       

      But everywhere is so green and the desert bloom is outrageous.........

      http://www.desertusa.com/wildflo/ca.html 

       

      Pat Redgate 

      Ameco Solar 

       

      In a message dated 4/25/2010 12:24:53 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
ma...@pvthawaii.com writes:

        Pat,

         

        Kicked your butts as far as lower output?  If so, by how much on a 
percentage basis?

         

        On the Big Island of Hawaii, we’ve had a very active volcano doing its 
thing since 1983.  With the normal trade winds, the vog (volcanic smoke + fog) 
gets blown south past the volcano, around the south tip of the island and then 
back up along the west side of the island.  Which means that Kona-side 
residents can be in a yucky vog zone for days and sometimes longer.  Think L.A. 
on a smoggy summer day.  And as far as percentage decrease in solar output, I 
really have little accurate clue.

         

        Marco

        ProVision Solar

         

        Kicked out butts, in fact.

         

        Pat Redgate

        Ameco Solar

         



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  List sponsored by Home Power magazine

  List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

  Options & settings:
  http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List rules & etiquette:
  www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

  Check out participant bios:
  www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to