I figure the PV cost at the total installed cost per watt (module, rack, labor)

R. Walters
r...@solarray.com
Solar Engineer




On Apr 9, 2010, at 12:55 PM, toddc...@finestplanet.com wrote:

> Has anyone included the extra racking costs to add additional modules used to 
> compensate for wire loss?
> 
> Todd
> 
> 
> 
> On Friday, April 9, 2010 10:46am, "R Ray Walters" <r...@solarray.com> said:
> 
> All our economic analysis is based on a 20 to 25 year life.  
> Safety first, but then good design is to spend the customer's money where it 
> does the most good.
> No matter how big the wire, you will always have losses. It is an exponential 
> curve that never reaches zero. 
> It just costs more and more for each extra watt saved. 
> Nobody would install a 4/0 cable for a 50 watt panel, even though the losses 
> would be lower.
> As soon as the design wire starts getting big, I start looking at 
> alternatives: raise the array voltage, relocate the array closer, etc.
> Also, this discussion concerns the DC losses, we've all agreed that AC losses 
> can cause shutdowns that greatly exceed the wire loss itself.
> 
> R. Walters
> r...@solarray.com
> Solar Engineer
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 9, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Bill Hoffer wrote:
> 
>> Ray
>> 
>> I think that the point is not the cost, but what is good electrical design!
>> 
>> Voltage Drop in a wire is still undesirable and equates to an unneeded 
>> "heat" load on the wire.  Are we advocating that if your water pipe is too 
>> small just increase the pressure so you get the same output you desired.  
>> Sure as long as you are well within the operational limits of what the pipe 
>> was designed to do (over the lifetime expectancy of the product).  Maybe for 
>> a short period of time that is fine, but we are talking about a system that 
>> we want to perform for 25+ years.  I am sure we have all seen 25+ year old 
>> wiring in a house that has become brittle due to operating right at the 
>> limit, not enough to pop the breaker, but enough over a long period of time 
>> to deteriorate the copper.  Heat is not our friend.
>> 
>> The worse use of solar electricity is for heating, and I really do not want 
>> to install extra PV just to heat my wire.  Nobody said that good electrical 
>> design was cheap!  I will continue to design my voltage drop at 1.5% and as 
>> always attempt to meet that goal as inexpensively as possible.  NEC is a 
>> minimum we need to meet and is not necessarily the best electrical design 
>> practice!  When we are talking about Mega-watt commercial installations, It 
>> would be pretty silly to have a system shut down (ie lost production = lost 
>> investment money) because of saving some money on wire.
>> 
>> Bill Hoffer PE
>> Sunergy Engineering Services PLLC
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:41 PM, R Ray Walters <r...@solarray.com> wrote:
>> Over the same amount of time a similar investment in PV would save even more 
>> money.
>> 
>> R. Walters
>> r...@solarray.com
>> Solar Engineer
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Bob-O Schultze wrote:
>> 
>>> Guys,
>>> Is it just me being dense or are none of you folks advocating for higher VD 
>>> looking at the savings over time?
>>> If we assume that Kent's wire costs are correct (and even assuming a 33% 
>>> mark-up, he's paying WAY, WAY too much for wire) , the difference in 
>>> delivered watts between #10 and # 4 wire in this situation is 91W. If I 
>>> were installing this in Southern Oregon, which is pretty average as far as 
>>> peak sun hours/day go, we'd be looking at 91 x 4.5 (peak sun hours) x 
>>> 365days/yr x 25yrs = 3736 KW/H. Even at $0.10/KWH that's about $375 AT 
>>> TODAY'S POWER RATES. Anyone think those rates are going to stay the same or 
>>> go down over the next 25 years? Anybody think they won't go up by 5X? 10X? 
>>> 20X?
>>> So... for what and for whom are we designing these systems?
>>> Bob-O
>>> 
>>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Kent Osterberg wrote:
>>> 
>>> Nick,
>>> 
>>> Advocating for an economic comparison between the cost of wire and the 
>>> energy saved by larger wire is not the same as advocating for high voltage 
>>> drops, or low ones either.  Even with the present low prices for PV modules 
>>> and high prices for copper wire, a 100-ft long 350-volt dc input to a 3-kW 
>>> inverter should have around 1% voltage drop.   Now consider a 350-volt 
>>> 10-amp PV circuit that's 500 feet long.  Using 12 AWG copper the dc voltage 
>>> drop would be 5.5%.  Sounds like that might be a poor wire choice, right?  
>>> Look what happens as the wire size is increased:
>>> 
>>>                   Conductor         Power             $ per
>>> AWG   $/ft       Cost         ---- Loss ----     watt saved
>>>  12     0.62      $620        193W (5.5%)         -- 
>>>  10     0.95      $950        123W (3.5%)        $4.71        
>>>   8     1.54      $1540         77W (2.2%)      $12.83
>>>   6     2.37      $2370         49W (1.4%)      $29.64
>>>   4     3.73      $3730         32W (0.9%)      $80.00
>>> 
>>> It would be reasonable to use 10 AWG copper, but before going up to 8 AWG, 
>>> I'd consider buying more PV instead.  Why buy a watt of power at $12.83 
>>> when it cost less to buy a watt of PV?  The conductor price used here, just 
>>> for illustration, is from Southwire's price list for THHN/THWN wire dated 7 
>>> April 2010.  In the column of conductor costs I only considered the cost of 
>>> two current carrying wires.  The cost of the equipment ground wire, 
>>> conduit, connectors, etc all go up too.  That makes the dollars per watt 
>>> saved look even worse.
>>> 
>>> Kent Osterberg
>>> Blue Mountain Solar, Inc.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Nick Soleil wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I feel that it is best to maintain a 1.5% voltage drop on the AC and DC.  
>>>> However, I was just sizing conductors for a 400 KW project, with the array 
>>>> 1000' from the main service panel.  With AC modules, I would have needed 
>>>> 5-Parallel runs of 700MCM at 208VAC (20 wires at 700MCM for 1.5%VD!)  The 
>>>> cost would have been over 100K, which was cost prohibitive.  However, by 
>>>> running DC wiring, and utilzing AL, we were able to maintain 1.5 VDC drop 
>>>> without being too expensive (yet still expensive.)
>>>>  
>>>> Nick Soleil
>>>> Project Manager
>>>> Advanced Alternative Energy Solutions, LLC
>>>> PO Box 657
>>>> Petaluma, CA 94953
>>>> Cell: 707-321-2937
>>>> Office: 707-789-9537
>>>> Fax: 707-769-9037
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>>> 
>>> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>>> 
>>> Options & settings:
>>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>> 
>>> List-Archive: 
>>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>>> 
>>> List rules & etiquette:
>>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>>> 
>>> Check out participant bios:
>>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>> 
>> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> Options & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List-Archive: 
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>> 
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>> 
>> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> Options & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List-Archive: 
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>> 
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to