We have a local company who sells "designed", packaged systems wholesale to the public. IMO, their designs are poor and the quality of the customer installs are equally suspicious. I support incentive and tax credits penalizing this kind of behavior with lower financial support.
Todd On Monday, August 31, 2009 8:57pm, "Bill Brooks" <billbroo...@yahoo.com> said: Roger, Why would a legitimate contractor argue against this reducedincentive (it is not a penalty at all)? This is simply acknowledging the factthat operating a business and providing a long-term system warranty costs moneythat a self-installer does not have to carry. This actually came from a strongrecommendation I made to the California Energy Commission since early in therebate program over 30% of installations were “self-installed”which was a bunch of BS. These were black market contractors who did not wantto carry a system warranty or did not have the credentials to install thesystem. Once we installed the slightly lower rebate cleaned up most ofthe black market contracting and the number of self-installed systems went tothe real number of less than 5%. Arguing against the lower rebate was a mistake that you aregoing to regret. It’s helpful to learn from history before repeating it. Bill. From:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of rogerdixon Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 1:33 PM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Installer's grant Trythe DSIRE website, [http://www.dsireusa.org/] http://www.dsireusa.org/. It lists both state and federal incentives for renewable energy and energyefficiency. Upuntil this year, NJ would penalize a “self install”, reducing therebate amount by 15%. We argued against that and they have now removedthat penalty. RogerDixon Certified Wind Site Assessor Distributor & Installer of Solar & Wind Energy Systems SkylandsRenewable Energy, LLC 908.337.2057cell 908.730.6474fax roger.di...@skylandsre.com www.skylandsre.com Note: The information contained in thiscommunication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, mayconstitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of theaddressee(s). It is the property of the sender of this e-mail. Ifyou receive this e-mail in error, do not review, disseminate, or copy it. Unauthorized use, disclosure, or copying of this communication or any partthereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have receivedthis communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mailand destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including allattachments. From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of DrakeChamberlin Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 10:50 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: [RE-wrenches] Installer's grant Hello Wrenches, I wanted to see how other states are handling solar grants / rebates on thehomes of installers. In Ohio there is a grant program that gives $3.00 /Watt toward residential systems. Eligible installers must be approved bythe state, and funds are allotted to the installer. In this years program, there is a "conflict of interest" clause whichsays that installers, employees of installers and subcontractors of installersare not eligible for any grant funding from the grant received by theinstaller. It is likely that installers can hire their competitionto do installations. Do other states have this conflict of interest clause? Thanks, Drake Chamberlin Athens Electric OH License 44810 CO License 3773 NABCEP TM Certified PV Installer Office - 740-448-7328 Mobile - 740-856-9648
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
