My favorite is the Sharp 175 for off-grid and solar pumping applications; a sturdy, well built and consistent module for most applications. You can even get them fairly often!

Matt T

Kirpal Khalsa wrote:

Allen..Greetings....yes indeed it is an issue. we have been addressing with multiple charge controllers per system. we don't fight the current (not electrical). In the future the way i see it- the electronics will be more flexible and be able to handle the larger variety of string voltages. For example the long long long awaited apollo solar t100 which will allow voltages to exceed the 150V limit we have had for a long time. They have apparently even lined up some breakers which will work with these greater voltages. 3 modules in a series will no longer be a maximum. I understand midnite solar also has a charge controller which will allow the 150V max to go by the way side. We are trying to be flexible as modules become less standard and hope that the electronics will allow us to address thesee challanges as time goes by.

One thing that we would love to see is more large wattage modules with j boxes rather than pre-wired MC cables. In many of our off grid systems the array is located in readily accesible locations and crafting a fence or sticking the array over 8 feet of the ground is a big hassle/extra expense. This has proven to be a bigger concern for us rahter than the voltage variety. If you know of any 72 cell or for that matter 60 cell modules which allow flex conduit between j boxes we would love some info.......


--
Sunny Regards,
Kirpal Khalsa
NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer
Renewable Energy Systems LLC


On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Allan Sindelar <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Wrenches,
    Here's an issue I haven't seen directly addressed, and I would
    like to know what the rest of you are doing.
    It's getting harder to get 24V nominal modules. Because the bulk
    of industry growth is high-voltage grid-tied applications, modules
    no longer have to be a standard voltage. Just pick the number of
    modules to best fit the chosen inverter's string voltage range.

    But for off-grid, the odd cell counts and resulting
    "nontraditional" DC input voltages challenge the traditional rules
    of off-grid design. I may be fighting a losing battle here, as the
    industry changes so rapidly and fundamentally. I have been trying
    to stay with 72-cell modules for offgrid, as this most readily
    combines with existing systems with 36-cell modules (12V) and
    72-cell modules (24V).

    For example, I will use the new Canadian Solar 170-200W modules.
    They are 60-cell modules, with a Vmppt of around 28 volts - too
    low to charge 24V batteries with a standard charge controller. We
    can use them in any new systems with an MX60 or similar
    voltage-converting MPPT controller. Two or three in series would
    charge a 24V battery; 3 in series would charge 48V. Four in series
    would violate Code, as low-temp voltage would easily exceed 150V.

    Unless 60-cell modules remain a standard in the future, any future
    array additions would have to be on their own charge controller,
    in order to match a different I-V curve and MPP voltages into the
    same battery bank. Is this prohibitive? No, it just runs counter
    to the longstanding standards of off-grid design that allow
    modules to be added in the future: these modules will not add well
    to existing systems, and will not easily allow additional
    dissimilar modules to be added later.

    I had this same objection to using Day4 modules, although they
    were better at 16Vnom. Three made up a standard 48V array, so
    strings could be combined with two-module strings of similar
    24Vnom modules.

    Who else is trying to stay with 24V modules? Anyone still using
    12V modules in off-grid (residential-scale, not little apps)
    designs? Who has a crystal ball and knows what modules will be
    like in 20 years, or even two years? Wat are the rest of you doing?

    Thanks, as usual.
    Allan
    Allan Sindelar
    _allan_(at)_positiveenergysolar.com_
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    NABCEP certified solar PV installer
    Positive Energy, Inc.
    3225A Richards Lane
    Santa Fe NM 87507
    505 424-1112




------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------


Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1833 - Release Date: 12/5/2008 7:08 PM

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to