On Feb 9, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Greg Landrum <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:36 PM, William G. Scott <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Out of curiosity, why did you decide not to use whatever boost version >>> fink normally installs? >>> >>> -greg >> >> Fink has boost version 1.35, which I understood to be too old, and >> boost1.46.1.cmake, which I never was able to get rdkit to compile against >> (very possibly my ignorance). So I thought the most expedient thing was to >> use the latest boost and then if it works, nag the maintainer of boost 1.35 >> to update it. I think I'm far enough along to ask now. >> > > 1.35? Wow... that's 5 years old. That's almost as bad as CentOS 5! [1] > > -greg > [1] Problems building the RDKit on CentOS 5 caused by either buggy > compilers or old Boost versions were a recurring theme here for a > while, so that's a sort of bad joke. I suspect they wanted to migrate to boost.cmake. Will rdkit build with that (I couldn't get it to work, but that doesn't mean a whole lot…). If so, what is the minimum version that is compatible? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
