Hi Gianluca, On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Gianluca Sforna <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Gianluca Sforna <[email protected]> wrote: >> Any chance to have it in this release? > > More precisely, this was the proposal, and your reply: > > ========== >> I suggest you revise how you do name versions; one simple way to avoid >> the issue is to swap year with quarter, so 2010Q4 < 2011Q1. Avoiding >> non numeric versions would be a nice bonus, so you could use to the >> same effect something like "YYYY.MM" (so 2010.12 < 2011.04) > > This is ok with me if no one else has objections. > ===============
Argh. I managed to forget to do this when putting together the beta. I just made the changes on the trunk and checked them in (r1536). Please take a look and let me know what you think. For those who haven't been following this discussion, the RDKit version numbers will change with this release. The version number of the Q3 2010 release will be "2010.09.1" Best Regards, -greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
