Hi Wes, > - is there a way to specify JSON-LD 1.1 Framing parameters as arguments to > RDFpipe and the rdflib Python API?
We want to do a lot more regarding the options for the various parsers and serializers in RDFLib in 8.x. At the moment there are a number of parse/serialize options that are either hard to discover or undocumented. We plan on properly documenting the function signatures for all parsers and serializers and, In the case of JSON-LD, this will likely allow for framing. My team have personally being making good use of framing with JSON-LD > - Is there a longturtle respec spec? No. It's just an opinionated version of turtle that I made to improve Git diffs and readability. It mostly just inserts more linebreaks to output than the original RDFLib Turtle serializer. It's closer to the RDFLib original serializer than, say, Jena's Turtle serializer. At some point (8.x, 9.x??) we want to replace the current Turtle parser/serializer with a PEG-based soemthing, in line with other grammar-based toolkits in other projects, but this will likely only come after the parser/serializer function signature improvements, unless someone wants to submit a PR... Cheers, Nick On Tuesday, 1 October 2024 at 10:43, Wes Turner <wes.tur...@gmail.com> wrote: > - JSON-LD 1.1 Framing: > - > - https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib-jsonld/issues/93#issuecomment-1636809892 > - https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-framing/#framing-0 > - https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11-framing/#framing-0 > - is there a way to specify JSON-LD 1.1 Framing parameters as arguments to > RDFpipe and the rdflib Python API? > > - W3C YAML-LD: > - > - links to specs, src, tests: > https://github.com/google/yamlfmt/issues/-125 > > - RDF 1.2: > - > - "Changes between RDF 1.1 and RDF 1.2" > https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-turtle/#changes-12 > > - Pyodide WASM and rdflib > - JupyterLite works in a browser without a server, on chromebooks too; does > rdflib work - do the tests pass - in JupyterLite with the Pyodide JupyterLite > kernel? > - there's a shim from python to js fetch() > - there's SQLite in WASM (with synchronization to postgres) or indexeddb > > - Is there a longturtle respec spec? > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024, 9:40 AM Nicholas Car <n...@kurrawong.ai> wrote: > >> Dear RDFLib users, >> >> Ashely, Edmond, David and I are preparing for an RDFLib 7.1.0 release next >> week to make available all the recent month's changes. we will then prepare >> for an 8.0.0 release in perhaps 2 months time. >> >> 7.1.0 is planned to be the last 7.x release and 8.0.0 will fix/break a few >> things. >> >> Proposed for 8.0.0 are: >> >> - Python 3.11+ only >> >> - removing support for older Python allows us to remove dependency on six & >> isodate which prevent some packaging systems making RDFLib available >> - Rationalise the supported Stores >> >> - remove BerkeleyDB - it's old, not completely implemented and likely >> unused. If you want to use it, it will always be available via 7.1.0 >> - Fix the Dataset API >> >> - ConjunctiveGraph is deprecated already and will be removed >> - The Dataset API has been annoying for many of us for years, we will fix it >> - Switch the current default & longturtle serialisations >> >> - longturtle is more modern (Turtle 1.1 syntax), better arranged for Git and >> moving to support better sorting >> - Tidying up the Namespace Manager functions for all Stores >> >> - ensuring that unbinding/replacement binding works correctly for all known >> stores >> - improved documentation >> >> - an ever-present issue >> >> We also plan to improve the build system a bit too by: >> >> - removing the pre-commit tool >> >> - this duplicates work done by our stying & test suites and causes build >> problems >> - removing the Poetry lock file >> >> - this complicates PR merging >> - it is not appropriate for RDFLib as a library >> - we will implement a requirements.min.txt file for working minimum versions >> of dependencies >> >> This is fairly small stuff and still we have the following larger things on >> the horizon (for after 8.0.0): >> >> - RDF-star handling >> >> - several un-merged PRs have attempted to address this >> - improved SPARQL handing >> >> - complete the handing of SPARQL 1.1 grammar >> - SPARQL-Star >> - Tidying the parser & seralizer interfaces >> - comprehensive documentation review >> >> - many function's options are undocumented >> - command line tools are not listed everywhere >> - we could do with more examples of how to use RDFLib in modern ways >> >> Please reply to this or put Issues into GitHub. >> >> Happy RDFing, Nick >> >> -- >> http://github.com/RDFLib >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "rdflib-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/4xawYFmRtja_y6KX3PL0mby69XUmULtResuWgW9B6v9Cijg-bpseHvCetnlGQbjMtj9gGdMfqH8iTvXZky7Agor67vim6gY2AQYp1lt1SIA%3D%40kurrawong.ai. > > -- > http://github.com/RDFLib > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "rdflib-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CACfEFw_AwAK1bfMVGNCcxtRnk1T8h1c8sH7fsfOFJy7aOgncfw%40mail.gmail.com. -- http://github.com/RDFLib --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/Bso7khkDRYm-yq-4XksbzQdAmH_vFsGCVwQIRynySKuyojQB99iybbqhKIVz-9YTHIZK_Tkpcmk6oZtNsKfaprYxutIIERwAMXK2-aTBC8o%3D%40kurrawong.net.
