Hi Nick, On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 03:06:54 UTC+2 ni...@kurrawong.net wrote:
> That's a good list of *general* thinks for RDFLib but I was asking for > particular things focussed on RDFLib + RDF-star. As a student, Song has to > do new investigative things, not just engineering enhancements to > something, as useful as they may be. > > So let's keep the ptioroty order you've indicated here - I agree with it > all: systematic parsers, better tests etc. - but talk again about the > RDF-star work. > Specifically RDF star related it would be nice to have N-Quads-star also, N-Triples-star and TriG-star would also be nice if Turtle-star is a superset of N-Triples-star it is not that essential, and N-Quads-star will likely be simpler than TriG-star. Other than that it would be nice to see conformance testing with the Turtle-star test suite. Performance testing would also be nice but may involve quite a bit of complexity, if we do performance testing it would be nice to have it done in a way that we can integrate into the CI pipeline and I guess ideally it should just be checking the performance of the parser/serializer and avoid/sidestep our store implementations, but comparing it to other implementations will likely not tell us that much, as it is not likely to have any performance advantages over most other languages. Not sure that is very helpful, will keep it in mind and respond if I can think of more. Regards Iwan Aucamp -- http://github.com/RDFLib --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/82ffcf89-160e-427e-ad35-77f462e1448bn%40googlegroups.com.
