It was listed as 54, but is actually a 56. I stopped by yesterday on the way home after riding the Santa Rosa 200K on my Bob Jackson fixed gear. First thing that struck me was how much heavier the QB felt. It's a nice bike, but I would much prefer to get just the frame/fork. I hope we can find a good compromise...
--Metin On Saturday, January 18, 2014 11:16:50 AM UTC-8, Cyclofiend Jim wrote: > > Ha! Pretty sure I spotted/cataloged that one "in the wild" back in '09 > > go here - scroll down: > http://cyclofiend.com/rbw/quickbeam/ > > saddle and bars look pretty much the same. photo was with my phone at the > time, which had a hinge in it, so any visual imperfections are likely > hardware based... > > - J > > On Saturday, January 18, 2014 9:35:46 AM UTC-8, rcnute wrote: >> >> Looks neat! http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/bik/4292311064.html >> >> Ryan >> >> On Saturday, January 18, 2014 9:32:25 AM UTC-8, Bill Lindsay wrote: >>> >>> and by "56 'beamer" I mean 56cm Quickbeam. Metin, maybe this one is >>> teed up for you to buy? I'm on my phone, and can't easily post the link. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
