@ Patrick- I totally understand that and shop appropriately. But I was looking at the same garment from the same manufacturer. And it's funny how most things "athletic fit" are generally fashion clothes not intended for athleticism.
I think I was mainly surprised to see an overly baggy piece from a company like Patagonia. My experience is that the outdoorsy / sports apparel suppliers are by default "athletic" fitting. It's funny, looking into actual physical measurements of the snap t by sellers on eBay, many of the current "mediums" are listed as 24-25" pit to pit. That's a 50" chest! I'm guessing my old one was right at 40". That a pretty drastic upsizing. Regardless, it's just an interesting look into how standards and perceptions of them are always in flux. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
