That's because bicycles are "toys". $200 for a toy? Now in one real sense, bicycles are toys -- if cycling weren't fun, I'd give it up in a minute. But they are not "toys", obviously, in the sense of "trivial", "frivolous", lacking in useful value.
"$200 for a TV? For a computer?? For a effing iPhone?!!" That makes more sense. On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Peter Morgano <uscpeter11...@gmail.com>wrote: > I had an old man struggle to understand how any bike could cost more than > $200. -- > > -- http://resumespecialties.com/index.html patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com Albuquerque, NM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
