Is this a problem? In my experience, NPS campgrounds have either "unlimited" capacity hiker-biker sites or they have campground hosts that are willing to make accommodations for a weary cyclist.
On Friday, December 7, 2012 4:50:30 PM UTC-6, iamkeith wrote: > > A friend just sent me a link to this petiton on the whitehouse.gov > website, and I thought many of you would be interested. Since its > political and everyone is entitled to have their own views, I'll stop > short of saying "sign it." > > But it's a nice idea: If someone arrives at a National Park Service > campground under self-propelled power, but the campground is otherwise > full, then the campground would have to accommodate them anyway. If > you've ever been stuck in a national park late at night without a > place to camp, miles from the next possible location, and not even > knowing if it will have availability, you understand what a nice thing > this would be. > > Otherwise, I don't know much about the petition process or the > individual/organization who started this one. Looks like it has met > the minimum number required to be officially "posted" "or "searchable" > but it still needs a lot of signatures in the next few days in order > to meet the author's goals. > > > https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/require-national-park-service-allow-camping-all-self-propelled-visitors-even-if-campground-full/f5TJCW7Q > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/gQIZdluyzWYJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
