Do you think there would be an interference problem with the high profile brakes? I mean do the struts for the marks clear them ok? I would prefer the Marks since if I do ever get another bag it has more than one use, unlike a dedicated saddlebag rack.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Allingham II, Thomas J < [email protected]> wrote: > Haven't used the R-10, but I had a Mark's Rack on the rear of my Quickbeam > for a while. It worked well for support of saddlebags -- better than the > Bagman I replaced it with. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter M > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:08 PM > To: RBW Owners Bunch > Subject: [RBW] Nitto R-10 vs Marks Rack for Saddlebag > > So I have been waxing and waning over whether to get the Bagman for my > Carradice Pendle. I just don think it is a good choice due to the fact I > want to just be able to mount it and not worry about it coming loose and > the fact that I dont want anything mounted to my saddle. I was trying to > decide now between the Nitto R-10 and the Marks Rack and was wondering if > anyone has used both or has first hand experience with using either one > with a sprung saddle and high profile brakes (paul neo retro). Thanks to > any advice yall can offer. > > Peter > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > **************************************************** > > To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we advise you > that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice > contained in this message was not intended or written to be used, and > cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under > the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions > or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any > tax-related matters addressed herein. > **************************************************** > **************************************************** > > This email (and any attachments thereto) is intended only for use by the > addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or > confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this > email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this email (and any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited. > If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (212) > 735-3000 and permanently delete the original email (and any copy of any > email) and any printout thereof. > > Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their > professional qualifications will be provided upon request. > **************************************************** > > ============================================================================== > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
