I would be interested in recommendations of another cycling periodical that has a more rigorous approach. Most bike mags I've read give a cursory glorifying review of all bikes/components, and are certainly no more than quick opinion pieces. I've found BQ to be better for me in that Jan is an enthusiast that comes to the sport from a different angle (long distance riding) and appreciates a more sporty ride, but has an appreciation for aesthetics as well. I like that he has an opinion. Most journalists either don't, or won't.
Brian Seattle, WA On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:10 AM, <justinaug...@gmail.com> wrote: > You would have to show me some pretty rigorous tests to prove that across > the board, stuff = slow. I LOVE BQ and all that it does for cycling, both > technically and culturally, but I have yet to see tests that strike me as > being rigorous enough to assert anything from them as an axiom or anything > more than a anecdotally observed theory. > > Justin, in Philly > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/5yzKTVMLIX0J. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
