John:

Totally agree on the need for low riders.  Esteban's photo showing the
rear load placement is intriguing.  Your idea of a "lasher rack"
sounds a good one.  I've been carrying my clothes, etc, heavier stuff
up front on a Tubus Duo and the camping gear (lighter but bulkier) on
the rear, on a Nitto big back rack, and this combination is quite
stable.  I was surprised when such a light load on the rear was so
noticeable, and merely moving it to the front was such a change.  The
classic "2 bags on the back & bar bag in front" doesn't work for me,
even with a light load.

Like to see photos of the lasher rack when you get it done.

dougP

On Apr 12, 11:38 am, John Speare <j...@phred.org> wrote:
> Doug -- I agree with this:
>
> >> FWIW, I've been exploring this issue for
>
> years and keep coming back to the same conclusion:  weight in front
> first.
>
> with a big old caveat: as long as the weight is on low riders, not above the 
> wheel. Tubus Tara is my favorite.
>
> I'm going to build a "lasher" rack for my main camping/touring/s240 bike -- 
> the idea is to haul heavy stuff up front, and to lash light bulky stuff 
> (sleeping pad and bag) on the lasher rack, which will sit low and behind my 
> rear axle.
>
> John Speare
> Spokane, WAhttp://cyclingspokane.blogspot.com/
>
> ________________________________________
> From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com [rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] 
> on behalf of dougP [dougpn...@cox.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:08 PM
> To: RBW Owners Bunch
> Subject: [RBW] Re: Newsflash: High-trail Rivendells work with rear-load bias!
>
> My Atlantis has always handled better with a front weight bias.  Just
> last weekend I did an S24O with maybe 10 lbs per bag (tent in one,
> sleeping bag in the other, misc clothes) and just tossing that onto
> the rear was noticeable.  I had my front low riders on so had the
> chance to move the same load to the other end on the same ride and
> voila!  What a difference.  FWIW, I've been exploring this issue for
> years and keep coming back to the same conclusion:  weight in front
> first.
>
> Very cool looking rack set-up, Esteban.  Glad it works out; looks like
> heel strike wouldn't be an issue.
>
> dougP
>
> On Apr 11, 5:22 pm, EricP <ericpl...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Seems to me Jim Thill posted a while ago that the new Atlantis chainstays
> > were pretty long.  Enough so a 970 chain was just barely able to get around
> > a similar setup.
>
> > To Esteban - nice setup.  Never have tried a low panniers.  Don't have a
> > rack equipped for it.  It looks nice on your Protovelo. Afraid the
> > bags would pick up too much grime here in Minnesota.  Especially in the
> > non-summer months.
>
> > Eric Platt
> > St. Paul, MN
>
> > On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 5:19:21 PM UTC-5, franklyn wrote:
>
> > > How long is really the chainstay? Grant only wrote that some sizes will
> > > have chainstays longer than 46cm. My wife's 1982 Trek 720 has a chainstay
> > > of 47cm, and you can definitely see and feel that extra length. One place
> > > where one experiences issue is chain length. A brand new SRAM 970 chain 
> > > out
> > > of package is not long enough for 46T chainring/32T large cog combination.
> > > I was too lazy to lengthen the chain but tagging on a few more links, but
> > > for now just told my wife not to shift to the Big-Big combination lest she
> > > wants to break the derailleur.
>
> > > Franklyn- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to