It's been said that a bicycle without fenders is just a toy. To me that's a little extreme, but makes a good point if the bicycle lives in an area that gets more than, say, 35 inches of rain per year. However in my opinion it's not too extreme to say the same thing about provision for carrying cargo, however small (and not just water bottles).
NOT that there's anything wrong with toys(!)- but I think bicycles deserve a better purpose at least once in their lifetimes. On Monday, November 21, 2011 10:15:03 AM UTC-5, James Warren wrote: > > > They're not. > > I know stubborn people who stop just short of telling me that they > wouldn't be caught dead ever attaching anything resembling a bag to their > bike. It means that the kinds of rides I like to do (overnighters) are > never an option for us planning group events. > > -Jim W. > > > On Nov 21, 2011, at 6:53 AM, René Sterental wrote: > > > I'd like to see them pulling/pushing my heft and see if they'd even be > riding... > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/jFDCMl-oXyEJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
