Finally something making a little sense......I can't see any chain coming off a chain ring assuming there is tension from the rear deraileur....I've been scratching my head wondering what the heck all the chatter is about. There have been quite a few 1x5's 1x7's 1x9 set ups made over the years and I've never heard of chains derailing due to chain angle.......if this were true you would derail all the time (front derailer or not) every time you hopped a root or hit a chuckhole.....if your rear tension spring is weak get a new one. Off my soapbox now......its early and my coffee was decaf........
On Oct 9, 9:21 am, Jeremy Till <jeremy.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you using the stock rings on the crankset? If you decide to go the > derailerless route I'd make sure you were using singlespeed specific rings > (which you should be able to get in both 32t and 42t) or old rings from the > era before there were ramps and pins and "profiled" teeth. Having uniformly > tall teeth and none of the little shift aids might just be enough to prevent > the chain unshipping for your type of riding. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
