Ithought that the Hoss was even bigger than the current Sackville large which is -- stuffed -- almost 2000 cu (1984). Certainly the Hoss is bigger than the Nelson LF?
Patrick Moore On Sep 24, 2011, at 11:34 AM, charlie <[email protected]> wrote: > 1010 cubic inches not sure the conversion factor to liters but (1465 > cu in is 24 liters) This came off 'Large fella on a bike's' page. My > Nelson Longflap is supposedly 1200 cu so a pretty big bag. If its a > good deal just get it. > > On Sep 24, 9:21 am, PATRICK MOORE <[email protected]> wrote: >> Does anyone know? Ought I to have spelled that "litres"? >> >> I need a quickly removable 'trunk' for the Ken Rogers and one may be >> available used. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> Patrick Moore >> Albuquerque, NM >> For professional resumes, contact >> Patrick Moore, ACRWhttp://resumespecialties.com/index.html > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
