I run the campy racing triple on a 48/34/26 triple and a 44/30
double.  I works very well, much better than the 105's it replaced.
It has a very short cage, which allows it to be set very low without
interfering with the chain stay.

michael

On May 8, 4:57 pm, BCDrums <bcdr...@comcast.net> wrote:
> It's hard to know which derailer has a matching radius without being
> able to hold it up to the chainring. I'm beginning to lean to the IRD
> because it states that it is designed for the big ring I have. Other
> derailers just list a maximum ring size.
>
> BC
>
> On May 8, 9:37 am, Bill Lucas <wheelslu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > BC,
>
> > The IRD Aplina is not a copy of the Ultegra.
>
> > I used it to replace a 9-speed Ultegra on a 48-34-24 set up.  The
> > Ultegra was VERY fussy to get working.  I literally bolted the IRD in
> > place, adjusted the stops and it works perfectly.  All that said, I
> > tried one on my wife's new Ebisu All-Purpose and it didn't work well.
> > I played with it for a while.  I ended up changing it to a Shimano
> > FD-4403 Tiagra.  The Tiagra was modified to match the chainring
> > radius.  These are indexed bicycles.
>
> > You need to get a front derailleur that matches the chainring radius.
> > Sometimes it takes a swap ot two too get it right.
>
> > Bill
> > Watsonvillle, CA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to