seems the undertube is functional.

also seems the taiwan hillbornes chould serve most who don't want the
undertube.

i like the update about color. not that i don't like orange, but i
like the green.

"UPDATE April 1, 2011: Incoming Taiwan Sam Hillbornes are green!" -
rivbike dot com

On Apr 18, 11:49 am, grant <grant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Amos...I'm not sure when it'll come out. I hear, from Merry Sales,
> that it'll be about a month....but I know from experience that it
> could be three. It won't hit with a big splash anyway---the last I
> heard, MS was going to bring in only fifteen each of the 54, 59, and
> 63; and of those fifteen, RIV's buying five each. (The 47, 51 650B
> models will come later, after another sample.
>
> RIV's role in it is limited to geometry and the undertube. Plus, I
> approved the tubing. I wanted to make sure the tubes are suitable for
> the kind of bike it is supposed to be---a sporty road bike. Not a
> touring/country bike. But it will clear 33.333mm tires with a fender
> which means about a 36 or 37 without; and it'll have rackmounts on the
> seat stays for a rack or saddlebag support. Two eyelets on the rear
> drops, one on the front. Same tubing butts and bellies as the
> Rambouillet and Hilsen, but a diff brand (Tange Prestige).
>
> The undertube is a go/no-go feature for some, I know that, but I don't
> look at stuff like that and think, "Classic/traditional/classy/
> goooood" or "wuzzupwiddat?/bad". As the frame gets bigger, it loses
> triangulation and the structure that comes so much from that
> triangulation. The undertube gives turns would otherwise be a rhombus-
> like shape into more of a triangle. It means a tall dude who needs the
> triangulation gets some of it back, and so to me, it makes sense. The
> alternative is  much fatter tubes, but I don't like fat tubes. It's an
> easier way and requires less brazing or welding, but to me (maybe only
> to me--I don't rule that out), it's the cold-hard-lazy-unattractive
> way to do that. Depending on the particulars (how fat?), it may be
> even MORE effective, but I'm not shooting for No. 1 lateral rigidity;
> just trying to get back some that's lost in the frames with taller
> head tubes.
>
> I agree that a 59cm frame ordinarily may not scream for an undertube,
> but the 59 Amos has a 6-deg upslope, which gives it the head tube
> height of about a 65....and yet the top and seat tubes are still 0.8 x
> 0.5 x 0.8 (butt-belly-butt). The U2b, in this case, helps more than
> going to 0.9 x 0.6 x 0.9 would. Good point, of course, about it's
> possible unnecessariness on a bike for fenders but not racks, but on a
> bike that could conceivably be ridden by a 290-lb rider, a little
> conservativeness is not a bad thing. Historically--going back to the
> '70s, touring bikes used 1.0 x 0.7 x 1.0 tubing, big race bikes used
> 0.9 x 0.6 x 0.9 tubing, and race bikes for light riders used 0.8 x 0.5
> x 0.8 tubing. "Record attempt" bikes used 0.7 x 0.4 x 0.7.
>
> These days that's all out the door, there are different rules and
> expectations--and tubes have gotten larger in outside diameter, and
> some of the metallurgy has changed---but it's still good to see the
> historical view and to recognize that the reason for the change is
> more related to marketing and steel's perceived need to compete with
> unsteels, than because "we know so much more now."
>
> Anyway...it seems only 30 U2bers will be around in the foreseeable
> future, and I'm glad we're getting ten of 'em! Sorry for the long
> post. As always, I submit it in a good spirit, not to slam the door on
> further discussion/dissention.
>
> G
>
> In the end, the contribution the AMOS will make to riders outside of
> our bubble here, is that it will raise the bars humongously higher; it
> will allow them to ride tires that are humongously more useful, and
> it'll let them ride with fenders, which they won't likely be able to
> fit on whatever other bike the Amos is going neck-and-neck with.
> BUT...this contribution will be limited by the sad fact that there
> will be only 30 of them available to the country's 4,200 bike dealers.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to