man that Paul post is very nice. Any input on the setback? It looks huge. Looking foward to more info.
~Mike On Mar 3, 3:39 pm, bfd <bfd...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 3, 12:48 pm, Bruce <fullylug...@yahoo.com> wrote:> --- On Thu, 3/3/11, > omnigrid <omnig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: omnigrid <omnig...@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Best non-Nitto/VO seatpost? > > To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com > > Date: Thursday, March 3, 2011, 10:24 AM > > > I disagree about thomson being "the best made, most reliable seatpost on > > the planet." They are great, but not the best for all applications. > > > I'd always go with cold-forged than cnd'ed any day. And Thomsons dont work > > well with brooks or other leather saddles with short rails, unless you get > > the gross setback version. but on the cnd'd front, paul comp has a new > > seatpost with massive setback. > > Agree, I prefer Campy or Dura Ace seatpost over Thomsons as I have an > older DA AX post on one bike and a Campy ti post on another. I also > have a surprising strong, but heavy kalloy. Don't get me wrong, > Thomson makes a nice post, but it isn't *better made* or *more > reliable* than Campy or DA. Good Luck! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
