On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Jim Cloud <cloud...@aol.com> wrote: > I agree that pockets at the back of the vest would increase its > utility. Here's some photos from Lesli Larson's Flickr Archival > Clothing photostream that show the earlier version of the Rivendell > vest: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/archivalclothing/3251797465/in/photostream/
On the one hand, useful. On the other hand, really ugly. Really really ugly-- that narrow patch pocket is awful. So it's a balance: do you want a sweater that's useful on the bike, but looks ridiculous when you're not riding? The armholes on the earlier version of the vest are way better. For the newer version, it looks like the sweater designer had never designed a vest-- vests need a different armhole, deeper and curved. You can see in the pictures that the armhole is too high, so it wrinkles. I'd cut the shoulders in too; I think it looks better. -- -- Anne Paulson My hovercraft is full of eels -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
