I believe I use a 109/110 on my Hillborne with the RH cranks in 42-26 
configuration, I would have to go longer if I ran larger rings than that 
because the 26 is about 1mm from the chainstay - but of course the 
Hillborne is a bit thicker in this region than more roadish bikes. You 
might find with the Roadini's ample clearance and similar CS length that 
110 is as short as you'll be able to go. 

On Wednesday, 4 December 2024 at 14:32:00 UTC-8 isp...@gmail.com wrote:

> Hmmm... three 107-108 spindle votes on 130mm rear spacing. If I changed 
> from 113 to 107, assuming symmetric, brings the crank 3mm closer to the FD. 
> Perhaps it'll shift better if the FD isn't so far out on its swing (total 
> conjecture on my part) - might as well give it a go.
>
> Yes, DA 10sp barcons.
>
> Sounds like we're all using similar FDs... straight sided, 16t capacity... 
> I'm not inclined to buy another variant (DA7700, Chorus, Superbe Pro, 
> Microshift) until I try varying the spindle length first.
>
> Thanks much everyone!
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 at 10:37:11 AM UTC-7 maxcr wrote:
>
>> I use a 107 SKF on my Crust LB with RH 48-33. It has 130mm rear spacing. 
>> FD is Shimano Dura Ace and shifters are downtube Dura Ace 7700.
>> Max
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-6 John S wrote:
>>
>>> I use a 113 mm IRD cup and cone BB with the RH 48-33 double on my Hilsen 
>>> (135 mm rear spacing), and shifting is great with a Campy Chorus FD 
>>> (12-speed).
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 at 7:14:28 AM UTC-6 ascpgh wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...or RBWs.
>>>>
>>>> Andy Cheatham
>>>> Pittsburgh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 at 8:10:05 AM UTC-5 ascpgh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bill L. brings up a good point at the end of his bikes' BB and 
>>>>> crankset descriptions; the FD's shifter. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Many ills of FDs used outside manufacturer's recommended specs (T Max, 
>>>>> Range) and capacities of integrated shifters are eliminated by manual 
>>>>> levers, DT or bar ends. Makers don't want you to mix or deviate from 
>>>>> installation specs for a number of reasons that fly in the face of BOBs 
>>>>> doing BOB things to and on their bikes. 
>>>>>
>>>>> I am using RH 46/30 cranks, 130mm rear hub with the 116mm SKF BB. With 
>>>>> fenders over the 650B x 42 tires I had to dimple the lower DS end of the 
>>>>> rear fender to avoid interference with the chain on the largest cog and 
>>>>> inner chainring. I use a SunTour Superbe Pro (flat sides) FD with Shimano 
>>>>> bar end shifters. I don't have overshifts or fail-to-shifts on this 
>>>>> setup, 
>>>>> no chain rub on the steep grind climbs either.
>>>>>
>>>>> This build was what I wanted, a result of my evolved experience and 
>>>>> riding, not by any Shimano, SRAM or Campagnolo dictates. They don't have 
>>>>> solutions for riders like us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy Cheatham
>>>>> Pittsburgh
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2024 at 9:05:26 PM UTC-5 isp...@gmail.com 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Further context… I’ll be moving my drivetrain to a new 2024 “lugged 
>>>>>> Roadini” when those frames ship. Instead of reusing my 113mm BB, I can 
>>>>>> go 
>>>>>> with Riv’s default 110mm or I could source a 107mm and begin 
>>>>>> experimenting 
>>>>>> first with that (and BB shims). I dunno.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2024 at 7:03:20 PM UTC-7 J-D Bamford wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For a Rene Herse double crank (46-30) on a trad’ish randonneur 
>>>>>>> (130mm rear spacing, 700x32mm tire clearance + fenders, straight 
>>>>>>> chainstays 
>>>>>>> not curved)… what actual BB spindle lengths have people had success 
>>>>>>> with? 
>>>>>>> I’m aware of the RH charts… one chart suggests 110mm and the other 
>>>>>>> chart 
>>>>>>> suggests 107mm - so I’m more curious about actual experience ‘from the 
>>>>>>> field’.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Origin of my inquiry… poor FD shifts (FSA/IRD “compact double”, I’ve 
>>>>>>> tried them both)… either it throws my chain beyond the big ring and 
>>>>>>> onto 
>>>>>>> the crank arm… or I limit its travel and it won’t shift big at all. The 
>>>>>>> narrow Q on the RH crank arm minimizes any experimentation with FD cage 
>>>>>>> angle. And my cage sits just a mm or two above the big ring, akin to 
>>>>>>> Shimano’s alignment sticker. So now I’m wondering if my 113mm spindle 
>>>>>>> puts 
>>>>>>> the FD cage too far out in its swing. I could easily fit a 110mm 
>>>>>>> spindle, 
>>>>>>> and probably 107mm based on eyeballing clearance to the chainstays. 
>>>>>>> Maybe 
>>>>>>> shorter spindles would improve FD throw/alignment? Thanks in advance 
>>>>>>> for 
>>>>>>> any thoughts on this wandering missive. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/d71f344a-c695-45e9-bb36-f98019503aa6n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to