Jim, So, the protoype has a longer extension but sweeps back more than the current model? Does this mean that the effective extension of the prototype is shorter?
I had heard the prototype described by others as "longer reach," and your comments put that into a different light. Thanks for any advice! On Jun 23, 2:28 pm, CycloFiend <cyclofi...@earthlink.net> wrote: > on 6/23/10 9:50 AM, Jim M. at mather...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I'm still thinking, but it will have bullmoose bars. > > FWIW, when I was over visiting the RBWHQ&L last Friday, Keven showed me a > new prototype bullmoose. It has a little more length (reach) to the stem, > but the bars themselves sweep back a bit more. It was gorgeous and an > pretty useful seeming size. Unfortunately, it was not mounted on a bike. > > (The one in the image is not the new > one)http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclofiend/sets/72157624306953720/ > > - Jim > > -- > Jim Edgar > cyclofi...@earthlink.net > > Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries -http://www.cyclofiend.com > Current Classics - Cross Bikes > Singlespeed - Working Bikes > > Gallery updates now appear here -http://cyclofiend.blogspot.com > > "The bike between her legs was like some hyper-evolved alien tail she'd > somehow extruded, as though over patient centuries; a sweet and intricate > bone-machine, grown Lexan-armored tires, near-frictionless bearings, and gas > filled shocks." > > William Gibson - "Virtual Light" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
