I got used to assembling my own bikes and to be economical, I got used to using 
any old triple FD, usually a Shimano. But when I ordered my AHH from Rivendell 
a few years ago, I decided to pull out the stops and have Mark assemble it. I 
needed a FD and trusted Riv's selection, and they went with a Campy triple 
model called the Champ.

That is the smoothest and fasted shifting front shifter I've ever used. I never 
was picky about FD performance and can still tolerate slow, laborious shifts, 
but my experience has definitely been:

Shimano: pretty good, just deal with it
The one time I've used Campy: outstanding

-Jim


-----Original Message-----
>From: MichaelH <[email protected]>
>Sent: Jun 19, 2010 12:38 PM
>To: RBW Owners Bunch <[email protected]>
>Subject: [RBW] Re: Shifting issues with TA Pro 5 Vis cranks/rings
>
>I can confirm this.  I have replaced 105 derailleurs with campy CD  on
>both doubles (48/34) & (44/30) & a triple (48/34/26) and have gotten
>significantly improved shifting.  The campy feels a little slow on the
>tandem(50/36/24) but there is a lot more stress on the chain with a
>tandem.
>
>Michael
>
>On Jun 19, 11:50 am, David Faller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  I don't know from experience, but I've read that Campy
>> FD's are one of the more forgiving derailleurs.
>>
>> On 6/18/2010 9:12 PM, XO-1.org Rough Riders wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hi:
>>
>> > I've never gotten suitable shifting with a TA Pro 5 Vis crankset with
>> > 32/46 rings. This is mated with Shimano 9-speed on the rear (11x34)
>> > and bar-end shifters (Shimano 9 also). First I had it set up with a
>> > Suntour Superbe Pro front derailleur and it wanted to overshift once
>> > every 25 to 50 shifts, no matter how I adjusted the derailleur.
>>
>> > The local bike guru, who knows stuff old and new, suggested a modern
>> > front derailleur, as they are designed to shifter narrower 9/10-speed
>> > chains, whereas the old Suntour derailleur was meant for 6/7-speed
>> > chains. The thought being: Maybe the "old" derailleur's cage is wider
>> > because the chains for which it was intended were wider; now that
>> > wider cage made it throw a narrow chain too far. That make some
>> > sense.
>>
>> > Well, I've installed a brand new Ultegra 10-spd front derailleur and
>> > it seems to keep the chain on either one ring or the other, and it
>> > downshifts fine, but it takes a major tug on the shifter to get it to
>> > move the chain to the big ring. In fact, when I upshift, what it's
>> > trying to do is shove the chain between the rings, into the hole
>> > between the five arms of the right crank, in the sizable vertical gap,
>> > or hole, created by the 14 tooth difference in ring size. Of course,
>> > modern rings, with their ramps and pins, would probably toss that
>> > chain right up onto the big ring instantaneously. But I like the low Q-
>> > factor of these TA arms (this is actually my GF's bike I am talking
>> > about; she's 5'4" and prefer the narrower tread even more than I do),
>> > plus the ring sizes available are preferable to a "compact" design.
>>
>> > Yes, the derailleur is mounted as low as possible abov the top rights.
>> > In fact, the front derailleur cage is so long, it almost hits the
>> > right chainstay down at the bottom. I find that odd since a 46 tooth
>> > big ring is not small, at all. I don't see how this could work on a
>> > crank with a smaller big ring.
>>
>> > Any thoughts or suggestions?
>>
>> > BTW, sorry I don't seem to have a good shot of the bike, or especially
>> > its drivetrain online, though you can see her with the bike (gold 1974
>> > Williams converted to 650B wheels) in front of the Nate Harrison Grade
>> > sign near the bottom of this post:
>>
>> >http://www.xo-1.org/2008/12/rough-riding-northern-san-diego-county.html
>>
>> > We're headed out to Ramona / Black Canyon tomorrow and I'll get some
>> > shots of the parts in question then, in case that might help any of
>> > you help me assay the situation. Here's the blog report of a semi-
>> > similar version of the riding we're doing tomorrow:
>>
>> >http://www.xo-1.org/2009/01/rough-riding-north-eastern-san-diego.html
>>
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> > - Chris Kostman
>> > La Jolla, CA
>> >http://www.adventurecorps.com
>> >http://www.XO-1.org
>> >http://www.the508.com
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
>Owners Bunch" group.
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to