In Vt., we do lots of hills, my commute for example has two separate
mile plus climbs and descents with 7-10% grades - in each direction.
So I get plenty of opportunity to launch myself along in a 48/12.
Smaller cogs like a 12 will hit each tooth much more often than the
larger cogs.  When I'm running the 48/12 I will be turning it over 4
time per pedal revolution whereas when I'm in a 34/24 it's only 1.4
times, and there are twice as many teeth to hit on each evolution.  At
least that's why I believe I always wear out the smaller cogs first.
I wish it weren't so.

I think of chains and cables as general wear items and like to start
each season with new brake cables and a new or at least newish chain.

Michael

On Jun 9, 10:50 am, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 07:34 -0700, MichaelH wrote:
> > I clean the chain every couple of hundred miles, or sooner if I've
> > gone through wet & mud.  I ride 10 miles of dirt roads almost every
> > day, so even with fenders, my chains get dirty.  I use the Park tool
> > on my chains and find that I got about 1500 miles out of Shimano
> > chains, so I consider 2500 - 3000 miles pretty good.   Most mechanics,
> > and all mfg. recommend chains be replaced at about 1500 miles. I don't
> > often ride with a bike computer and don't keep any mileage log, but I
> > know that I do about 3500 miles commuting each season, and have never
> > pushed a chain longer than that.  A worn chain will wear out the cogs
> > much faster, and I find that if I push a chain too far, it will damage
> > the 12 tooth cog enough to cause skipping. I also use two sets of
> > wheels, so am using multiple cassettes and that might make a
> > difference too.
>
> I think the dirt roads are the key here.  I'm amazed that you wear out a
> 12T sprocket.  I find 12s to be nearly useless except on tandems and if
> you have a 44T big ring -- and even there, you're in the top gear so
> infrequently a 12 tooth sprocket could be transferred from cassette to
> cassette a half dozen times or more without showing significant wear.
> For me, it's the ones in the middle of the block that get the wear.
>
> Recommending a chain replacement at 1500 miles irrespective of wear
> might be fine if you are in the business of selling chains, but unless
> that chain is actually worn it's just wasteful.  If it is worn, of
> course replacement is in order.  Chains are much less expensive than
> cassettes.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to