The only one that fit me was the Bombadil, so the Bomba it would be. The 
parallel TT ones, but frankly it doesn't need it. It does make for a lift 
though, and being a straight gauge tube I can clamp it there to my Feedback 
workstand. I wouldn't pay more than $1700 for it though, not the over 
inflated 3k it ended up being when it went full diagonal extra tubes. All 
those extra tubes were unnecessary in real world riding though. 

This said, I'm pretty sure anyone can contact Grant about having a previous 
model made custom for not quite custom fee. It's not as if the blueprints, 
the form, vanishes. So there really is no need to bring back models as 
those models haven't gone anywhere. Consider them "off the menu" , formerly 
"on the menu" models.  
On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 7:59:08 PM UTC-5 Bill Fulford wrote:

> Bombadil, no question.
>
> On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 7:33:51 PM UTC-5 four...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> hands down, a Legolas.. ideally a Taiwan-made frame to save a little 
>> coin..
>>
>> I just picked up a new-to-me Rambouillet, so I'm covered there for now.. 
>> :) 
>>
>> On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 3:12:54 PM UTC-8 jackd...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My Hunqapillar is the favorite in the stable, but I think a case can 
>>> really be made to bring back the Bleriot. Classic geometry, MIT (I believe) 
>>> to keep the price reasonable, and I'd argue that the decal 
>>> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/30264143@N00/4689558205> is the best Riv 
>>> has done. 
>>>
>>> On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 2:55:32 PM UTC-8 Drew Henson wrote:
>>>
>>>> legolas OR a more classically styled country bike with close to level 
>>>> top tube and shorter chain stays
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 2:16:03 PM UTC-8 Scott wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I vote long stay version of Glorious and Hunqapillar in CLEAR COAT...
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope Grant is listening
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 03:11:33 PM MST, Mackenzy Albright <
>>>>> mackenzy...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All these threads about "choosing the one Riv" or "how do I pick which 
>>>>> model" got me thinking. If you could convince Rivendell to resurrect one 
>>>>> out of production model....which would you choose? 
>>>>>
>>>>> After acquiring a Clementine after a new Clem Smith Jr, I see merit of 
>>>>> the geometry of the Clementine as a standalone step through that feels 
>>>>> like 
>>>>> a long wheelbase agile bike rather than a floaty surfboard. I absolutely 
>>>>> adore both-but they're extraordinarily different, despite being a natural 
>>>>> and logical evolution. I really enjoyed the reference of the thread "a 
>>>>> tale 
>>>>> of two clems" by Ding Ding! as I found similarities in my experience. 
>>>>>
>>>>> The evolution of Rivendell's is absolutely fascinating to me as there 
>>>>> has never been a hang up for changing tried and true models. XO-1 - ALL 
>>>>> Rounder - TOYO Atlantis - MUSA Atlantis - MIT Atlantis. People are still 
>>>>> obsessive with each rendition of a concept over its evolution. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> SOoo long story short. I would choose the Hunqapillar. Hands down. 
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/386510c0-179e-4b8f-aecb-d1c8b8357553n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/386510c0-179e-4b8f-aecb-d1c8b8357553n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/d96747dc-de1a-4e58-949e-7bd76e97a245n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to