I entirely agree that position or fit generally is the most important thing in bike comfort and riding efficiently (yes, comfort is relative; but even a pro will ride faster if he is more comfortable than if he is more uncomfortable, and bad fit is probably the worst thing for comfort), and I agree entirely too that the entire virtue of drop bars is that they offer many different positions for comfort (yes, and efficiency, but believe me, tucked into the hooks against a 25 mph headwind in a 70-something fixed gear is a hell of a lot more comfortable than trying to buck that wind while sitting upright).
But!! Tell me if I am right or wrong: I thought that the entire smorgasbord of the many different Rivendell upright models came about precisely to give more comfortable upright riding with multiple hand positions -- isn't this right? I've not used any non-drop Riv bar since the old Priest and original edition Moustache bars, but I have been tempted to try an Albastache precisely because **I thought** that this was an improvement in hand positions and therefore comfort over the old Albatross and Moustache bars. Anyone? On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:51 PM George Schick <bhim...@gmail.com> wrote: > .... Consider instead what Nick Payne so clearly underscores in his very > accurate post above about the multi-position availability that the road > bars offer a cyclist that upright or flat bars simply cannot. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CALuTfgv-WtWfxg3hTcyYbgCtOOrR%3DApi_A2_LqCv0Yta7wRDJw%40mail.gmail.com.
