I realized I contradict myself on frequency. Forget the numbers; they're
more or less metaphorical -- metaphors for the more accurate qualitative
statements like "a lot" and "fewer".

Big Apple: flats rare. If you can tolerate 1 flat/week in a bad week, this
is the tire for you. I speak of the BAs from ~2000 up to about 2010.
Kojak: more often, but still can be shrugged off. I'd ride these today if
there were not Orange Seal.
Skinnies: more often yet, but by surprisingly few, and worth it for the
ride (Turbos, Pro Races, and GPs, in that order, rolled fast and smoothly
for their width at 80/90). Ditto.
Heavy Paselas: Like the skinnies.
559 1.25 Pasela: pretty bad, but tolerated for ride on wider tire.
PR and Elk Pass: impossible.

Again, standard is someone who routinely went through more than 1 box of
100 Remas a year, and bought them in lots of 200.



On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Patrick Moore <bertin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tim: It all depends how many flats/week you can tolerate. I rode the
> following tires in ABQ, NM without getting more than 3-5 flats over 60-100
> miles/week. I routinely went through a box and a half to 2 boxes of Remas
> per year.
>
> Listed in order of goathead resistance.
>
> Big Apple, 26 X 2.35 and 29 X 2.35. Almost goathead proof; rarely got
> punctured on dirt. I've come off a dirt trail and brushed literally scores
> of goatheads off each tire, then ridden away with no air loss over the
> following 24 hours.
> 26 and 700C 1.35" Kojak. Best "road" tire.
> Specialized Fatboy and Tioga City Slicker, early to late '90s. As with
> Kojaks, but perhaps goatheads less common pre-2010.
> Conti Grand Prix, early 2000s models, 559 X 1, 650C X 23. Not much worse
> than the Kojaks; say 5-6/week over 100 miles instead of 3.
> Michelin Pro Race 3 and 4: perhaps slightly more prone, but not by much.
> Specialized 26 X 1 Turbo, very early 90s: surprisingly flat "avoiding" for
> its supple ride -- nicer than GP and even Pro Race. But I used these only
> in the early '90s when, perhaps, goatheads were not quite as common.
> Heavier duty Paselas: more flat prone than Kojaks; anticipate 5/week.
> 26 X 1.25 folding, non-TG Pasela: flat prone; flats every other ride.
> Parigi Roubaix: 5 flats in first 20 miles. This is what made me go out and
> buy my first bottle of Stan's.
>
> The Big Apple is the safest non-sealant, halfway decent rolling tire I've
> used. The Kojak is tolerable for flats.
>
> I daresay the Elk Pass (el) would fare much like the PR.
>
> In other news: Schwalbe rep says 559 X 28 Pro One measures 28 mm +, even
> 20 mm, on 15 mm inside rim it was designed for; may try a pair, and may try
> them tubeless.
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:56 PM, 'Tim' via RBW Owners Bunch <
> rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm working for a few months in Casa Grande, AZ, about halfway between
>> Phoenix and Tucson, in the valley. I've got 3 bikes here, so I'm going to
>> pull the fenders off my Homer (which has become really fun with Albatross
>> bars) and put some wide (38-42mm) tires. It will be my around town, out to
>> the mountain, dirt canal path (maybe even a dirt century), light gravel
>> bike. I don't think I want Compass because, although I love them, I'm a
>> heavy rider and the rear Compass on my MAP wore out after 1500 miles. I
>> think they're too fragile. And I discovered goatheads yesterday on the
>> Hunqapillar. Patrick Moore, I think I honestly thought that I would be that
>> guy from the Midwest who came out here and didn't use sealant and didn't
>> get a flat. WRONG!!! Rear flat on the Hunqapillar. The the the goathead was
>> still all there. I didn't see the other four spots with just the slivers.
>> I got sealant and new tubes at the bike shop for the 700x2.1 Thunder Burts.
>> It was a huge mess. The first tube went ok but I guess I took too long on
>> the second and and it kept clogging and spewing and and what did go in
>> oozed back out. I think I'd just as soon not use it again but if the
>> consensus of the group is that I must, then I will. So, which tough tire
>> with no sealant. Or convince me to use sealant.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Resumes, LinkedIn profiles, bios, and letters that get interviews.
> By-the-hour resume and LinkedIn coaching.
> Other professional writing services.
> http://www.resumespecialties.com/
> www.linkedin.com/in/patrickmooreresumespec/
> Patrick Moore
> Alburquerque, New Mexico, Etats Unis d'Amerique
> **************************************************************************
> **************
> *Auditis an me ludit amabilis insania?*
>



-- 
Resumes, LinkedIn profiles, bios, and letters that get interviews.
By-the-hour resume and LinkedIn coaching.
Other professional writing services.
http://www.resumespecialties.com/
www.linkedin.com/in/patrickmooreresumespec/
Patrick Moore
Alburquerque, New Mexico, Etats Unis d'Amerique
**************************************************************************
**************
*Auditis an me ludit amabilis insania?*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to