I can see that, not wanting canti studs there if they're not being used....
Okay, maybe a non-Rivish thought, but, since the Hunqa could be considered a 29er, what about using disc brakes? (Have to admit, I know little about 'em, seems like it just complicates things more than they need to be, but, if it'd function well.....) On Feb 9, 1:03 pm, CycloFiend <cyclofi...@earthlink.net> wrote: > on 2/9/10 9:54 AM, Seth Vidal at skvi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Leslie <leslie.bri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> But doesn't the Sam have the bridge in place for calipers anyway? > >> Can't you have a bike set up for a caliper, but also for cantis, too? > > >> I like the cantis on my old Nishiki MTB, I have no objection to them, > >> thought the idea of the canti-Rom was a great idea when I heard about > >> it (I'm new to the Riv arena, they'd come and gone before I was > >> here... so, I'm learnin' all the time). > > > I think a bike with canti studs on it that is not using them looks a > > bit awkward. that's all. > > Agreed. You can remove the post so that you end up with the boss only. But, > it does create a bit of a warty spot on the seatstay and fork. > > - J > > -- > Jim Edgar > cyclofi...@earthlink.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
